2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1995-7645(10)60094-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misdiagnosis of tuberculosis and the clinical relevance of non—tuberculous mycobacteria in Zambia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study M. fortuitum , was isolated from a clinical case. The other studies conducted in the Western and Northern regions of Zambia [ 18 ] and other parts of the world [ 19 , 20 ] were in contrast with these findings. The reason for this difference is that NTM species distribution differs from one geographical region to another [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…In this study M. fortuitum , was isolated from a clinical case. The other studies conducted in the Western and Northern regions of Zambia [ 18 ] and other parts of the world [ 19 , 20 ] were in contrast with these findings. The reason for this difference is that NTM species distribution differs from one geographical region to another [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Our hypothesis was quite simplistic since if IP-10 showed no response, we predicted it was from an unconfirmed patient or a drug-resistant case. However, even though we used a sensitive gold standard diagnostic we can be reasonably certain that a proportion of the clinically diagnosed patients in fact did not have TB 2 , 3 . Thus, we believe we present a minimum estimate of the performance of our predictive model and we would have been more accurate if there was a way of ascertaining the TB status among those who were clinically diagnosed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, only 57% and 15% of notified incident pulmonary and extra pulmonary TB cases respectively are ever bacteriologically confirmed 1 . Among this large group of clinically diagnosed patients, there is likely a proportion of cases who initiate treatment without having TB 2 , 3 , or receive first-line therapy but have drug resistant TB (DR-TB) 4 . Providing TB treatment to a patient without TB risks drug-related toxicity and delays the diagnosis of the true cause of symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 1/14 (7.14%) is focusing on humans and water (42), 1/14 (7.14%) was done in humans, cattle and Kafue Lechwe (5) and another one is a case report 1/14 (7.14%) (43), one is a pilot study 1/14 (7.14%) (44) and one a case control study 1/14 (7.14%) (44). The remaining 9/14 (64.29%) are all cross section study focusing on NTM in humans (20,(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53). The study shows that the main specimens collected were sputum samples 10/14 studies (71.43%), one was a combination of sputum samples and brochoalveolar lavage, one was done on stored or archived isolates, one on a combination of stool samples, internal lavage and biopsy of the descending colon and lastly one was done on gastric lavage.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%