1984
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90625-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miscoding of hospital discharges as acute myocardial infarction: Implications for surveillance programs aimed at elucidating trends in coronary artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have investigated the validity of hospital discharge and/or mortality data on acute myocardial infarction by comparing these data with specific study registers [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] or physician reviews [5,[26][27][28]. In these studies, a wide range of estimated values for the sensitivity and positive predictive value was found due to differences in case identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have investigated the validity of hospital discharge and/or mortality data on acute myocardial infarction by comparing these data with specific study registers [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] or physician reviews [5,[26][27][28]. In these studies, a wide range of estimated values for the sensitivity and positive predictive value was found due to differences in case identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two possible explanations for this decreasing mortality rate are a decline in the population risk of CHD leading to a lower incidence, or a better survival of cases with CHD resulting in a lower case-fatality rate. Information about the trend in the incidence rate could be used to distinguish between these two explanations [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Health care organizations are currently using this data to assess the quality of care, evaluate hospital utilization and practice patterns, study the appropriateness of health care costs, conduct epidemiological studies, and supplement their decision support systems (Kennedy, Stern, & Crawford, 1984;Hannah, 1995). With the rise in ambulatory care over the past decade, the attention of health care professionals is now shifting to better understand the content of the ambulatory encounter.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity (true positive rate), also referred in some studies as "completeness" or "accuracy rate," is the conditional probability that a diagnosis within the specified group was coded on the original record given that a diagnosis within the specified group was actually present on the re-abstracted record (Fisher et al, 1992;Hogan & Wagner, 1997;Yarnall et al, 1995). Reported sensitivity rates of DRG diagnoses vary from 79% (Hsai et al, 1988), 94% for myocardial infarctions (Kennedy et al, 1984), 58% to 97% (Fisher et al, 1992), and 68% to 97% (Meyer & Krakauer, 1997). The most recent studies concerning outpatient diagnosis coding report slightly lower sensitivity rates that include 69% (Horner et al, 1991), 69%, and 82% (Yarnall et al, 1995).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%