2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miscibility-Driven Optimization of Nanostructures in Ternary Organic Solar Cells Using Non-fullerene Acceptors

Abstract: Non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs) with vibrant superiority over fullerene derivatives have proved advantageous as a guest component in a ternary blend signifying improved photon harvesting. However, heterogeneity of NFA-based ternary blend morphology is very complex, and the optimization requires simultaneous considerations of molecular miscibility and electronic properties. We discuss the role of guest NFA for an eased optimization of ternary blend photoactive layer in four different ways. Our four-model prospec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In out‐of‐plane profile, a diffraction peak at 1.83 Å −1 can be seen in high‐q region. Thus ZnP‐TBO is more readily to order upon spin‐coating and 6TIC is mostly dissolved or kinetically trapped in mixture (associated with TEM and RSOXS results) . We have seen previously that DPP‐porphyrin molecule family is quite immiscible with PCBM, and such a difference in NFSM system indicates the necessity of different optimization avenues.…”
Section: Photovoltaic Parameters For Znp‐tbo:6tic Devices With Differmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In out‐of‐plane profile, a diffraction peak at 1.83 Å −1 can be seen in high‐q region. Thus ZnP‐TBO is more readily to order upon spin‐coating and 6TIC is mostly dissolved or kinetically trapped in mixture (associated with TEM and RSOXS results) . We have seen previously that DPP‐porphyrin molecule family is quite immiscible with PCBM, and such a difference in NFSM system indicates the necessity of different optimization avenues.…”
Section: Photovoltaic Parameters For Znp‐tbo:6tic Devices With Differmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Compared with the binary device of PCE10:F8IC, the parameters of V OC , J SC , and FF indeed were improved. Especially, we found a clear increase in the EQE in the wavelength range from 500 to 900 nm (Figure b), and the enhancement was attributed to improved charge transfer efficiency in the optimized ternary blend due to more mixed donor/acceptor phases with larger interfacial areas when ≈18 wt% Eh‐IDTBR was added to the active layer . We also briefly analyzed the charge carrier recombination qualitatively by checking J SC and V OC under various illumination light intensities (Figure c,d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, E CT of 1.07 and 1.02 eV for the optimized devices of ternary and PCE10:F8IC were obtained, whereas 0.87 and 0.82 eV were determined from the intercept with the Y ‐axis for the optimized devices of ternary and PCE10:F8IC. Upon adding Eh‐IDTBR in the active layer to form a ternary mixture, we see that E CT was not affected dramatically, and it was attributed to the good miscibility of Eh‐IDTBR with both PCE10 and F8IC, as shown by atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Figure S5, Supporting Information) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure S6, Supporting Information) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[11] The origin of this difference may be related to the different aggregation properties between fullerene and IDTBR as well as the different miscibility between polymers and acceptors. [23,24,42] The apparent peak shoulder in the high q region shown in T4T and PffBT4T 90 -co-3T 10 profiles suggests the multiscale morphologies with different-sized domains, indicating different film-formation processes involved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20] Favorable donor-acceptor miscibility helps phase separation occur at appropriate length-scales during de-mixing of the blend component as the solvent evaporates. [21,22] Compared to fullerene molecules, the NFAs have shown many different physicochemical properties, such as high miscibility with donor polymers due to similar surface energy [23,24] and strong π-π interactions formed by electron-deficient end-capping units. [25] Thus, the development of new donor polymers matching the properties of NFAs requires a new understanding of the formation of the polymer-NFA photoactive blend.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%