2017
DOI: 10.3788/aos201737.0112005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misalignment Analysis of Cylindrical Inner Surfaces in Interferometric Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sun Hao from Changchun University of Science and Technology analyzed the misalignment error between a right angle cone and the inner cylindrical surface to be measured by taking the inner cylindrical surface as the measurement object. He classified the misalignment error into three types, namely, shift, rotate (also known as tilt), and top-angle error, and made calculations and simulations on the distribution of error interferometric light intensity caused by each of the misalignment errors [9,10]. Huimin Gao from Tianjin University and Shuai Xu from Suzhou University of Science and Technology have analyzed the misalignment errors of cones and cylinders based on their respective research objects, but there is a significant deviation in the calculation results between them [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun Hao from Changchun University of Science and Technology analyzed the misalignment error between a right angle cone and the inner cylindrical surface to be measured by taking the inner cylindrical surface as the measurement object. He classified the misalignment error into three types, namely, shift, rotate (also known as tilt), and top-angle error, and made calculations and simulations on the distribution of error interferometric light intensity caused by each of the misalignment errors [9,10]. Huimin Gao from Tianjin University and Shuai Xu from Suzhou University of Science and Technology have analyzed the misalignment errors of cones and cylinders based on their respective research objects, but there is a significant deviation in the calculation results between them [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%