Mistrust 2018
DOI: 10.1515/9783839439234-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mis(sing) Trust for Surviving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For entrepreneurial advantage, Nahapiet and Ghoshal ( 1998 ) emphasized to draw a distinction between structural, cognitive, and relational social capital due to the varying nature of each kind of social capital like trust. The rationale of “ trust” as social capital is a complex phenomenon in predicting outcomes; more importantly, due to mistrust, over-trust, and reputation-based trust scandals (e.g., Bürge, 2019 ; Laroche et al, 2019 ). Trust assumes primary importance with various new dimensions in the entrepreneurship literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For entrepreneurial advantage, Nahapiet and Ghoshal ( 1998 ) emphasized to draw a distinction between structural, cognitive, and relational social capital due to the varying nature of each kind of social capital like trust. The rationale of “ trust” as social capital is a complex phenomenon in predicting outcomes; more importantly, due to mistrust, over-trust, and reputation-based trust scandals (e.g., Bürge, 2019 ; Laroche et al, 2019 ). Trust assumes primary importance with various new dimensions in the entrepreneurship literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%