2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIRU-VNTR allelic variability depends on Mycobacterium bovis clonal group identity

Abstract: The description of the population of M. bovis strains circulating in France from 1978 to 2013 has highlighted the discriminating power of the MLVA among predominant spoligotype groups. In the present study we aimed to characterize clonal groups via MLVA and to better understand the strain's population structure. MLVA was performed with eight MIRU-VNTR loci, most of them defined by the Venomyc European consortium. The discriminatory index of each MLVA loci was calculated for SB0120, SB0134, SB0121 and the "F4-f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In areas where two different genotypes are isolated in wildlife, we observe exactly the same two genotypes in cattle. Strains with the SB0120 or the SB0134 spoligotypes are present in cattle and wildlife in different regions in France albeit presenting different VNTR profiles ( 26 , 27 ). These results highlight the epidemiological relationship between wildlife and cattle, and evidence that M. bovis infection spreads within a multi-species system in these areas as also observed in the UK, Ireland and Spain ( 28 31 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In areas where two different genotypes are isolated in wildlife, we observe exactly the same two genotypes in cattle. Strains with the SB0120 or the SB0134 spoligotypes are present in cattle and wildlife in different regions in France albeit presenting different VNTR profiles ( 26 , 27 ). These results highlight the epidemiological relationship between wildlife and cattle, and evidence that M. bovis infection spreads within a multi-species system in these areas as also observed in the UK, Ireland and Spain ( 28 31 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spoligotypes were named according to an agreed international convention 1 (Smith, 2012). MLVA typing (Frothingham and Meeker-O’Connell, 1998; Roring et al, 2002) was performed by Genoscreen (Lille, France), on 8 MIRU – VNTR loci: ETR A (2165), ETR B (2461), ETR C (577), ETR D (580), QUB 11a (2163a), QUB 11b (2163b), QUB 26 (4052), QUB 3232 (3232) chosen upon the Venomyc European consortium and described by Hauer et al (2015, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Hauer et al (2016) evaluated whether MIRU‐VNTR allelic variability in French isolates is related to clonal group identity, showing that each spoligo signature presents a different MIRU locus as the most discriminatory (Hauer et al, 2016). In contrast with M. bovis , M. caprae isolates reported by large surveys in Europe (Boniotti et al, 2009; Duarte, Domingos, Amado, & Botelho, 2008; Haddad et al, 2001; Rodriguez et al, 2011) seem to be considerably less diverse, with only two main clusters, the Iberian and the Central and Eastern European, identified by differences in spoligotyping profiles (Aranaz et al, 2003; Duarte et al, 2008; Erler et al, 2004; Kubica et al, 2003; Pavlik, Dvorska, & Matlova, 2002; Prodinger et al, 2002; Rodriguez et al, 2011).…”
Section: Drivers Of Animal Tb Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%