1999
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.59.r1731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mirroring behavior of partial photodetachment and photoionization cross sections in the neighborhood of a resonance

Abstract: Partial photodetachment and photoionization cross sections corresponding to highly excited residual atoms or ions are shown analytically to mirror one another in the neighborhood of a resonance. More precisely, any two groupings of partial cross sections are shown here to have components whose variations with energy near a resonance are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. This work extends an analysis of Starace ͓Phys. Rev. A 16, 231 ͑1977͔͒ for the behavior of partial cross sections near a resonance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation is even worse for the calculations of the α µ parameters (5), where all possible satellites have to be taken into account, including the Auger decay amplitudes V µ of the Xe 4d −1 5/2 6p (J = 1) state to the corresponding excited states of the Xe + ion. In order to qualitatively understand the opposite signs of the shift in table 1, we consider, in accordance with equations (9) and (11), the ratio of the C 1 parameters for the ionic states 6 and 19 (for q 1 and ρ 2 1 the second term in equation (11) can be neglected [27,39])…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The situation is even worse for the calculations of the α µ parameters (5), where all possible satellites have to be taken into account, including the Auger decay amplitudes V µ of the Xe 4d −1 5/2 6p (J = 1) state to the corresponding excited states of the Xe + ion. In order to qualitatively understand the opposite signs of the shift in table 1, we consider, in accordance with equations (9) and (11), the ratio of the C 1 parameters for the ionic states 6 and 19 (for q 1 and ρ 2 1 the second term in equation (11) can be neglected [27,39])…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cases where only one final ionic state P can be reached, for example for autoionizing states lying below the second ionization threshold, the weighted averages of the α parameters obey the relation α P = |α| 2 P = ρ 2 [27]. Then the coefficients C 1 and C 2 are directly related to the Fano parameters in photoabsorption, C 1 = qρ 2 , C 2 = (q 2 − 1)ρ 2 , and we obtain…”
Section: Particular Case: a Single Ionic Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter work similarities between partial cross sections belonging to different manifolds have been observed and related to the propensity rules for doubly excited states [16,17,18]. This type of similarity has to be distinguished from intramanifold similarities of partial photo cross sections such as mirroring and mimicking, as first noted by Liu and Starace [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…4 behave quite similarly while He + (N ′ = 2) mirrors their pattern. This mirroring and mimicking behavior of partial photo cross section is a universal intramanifold feature [19]. So far, we have presented illustrative examples for the cross sections to highlight the accuracy of our calculation.…”
Section: Unfolding Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the subvalence s-shell photoexcitation in rare gas atoms [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and closely related species [18][19][20][21] have been noted for the window type resonances, appearing as dips in the continuum background of the photo-absorption spectrum. Window resonances are extreme cases of the Beutler-Fano profile with profile index q close to zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%