2019
DOI: 10.22329/csw.v13i2.5868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mirror Method as an Approach for Critical Evaluation in Social Work

Abstract: In this article, the Mirror method is studied as an approach to critical evaluation. The method offers a research approach to social work practice that is in line with the ideology, mission, and purposes of critical evaluation. The strengths of the approach include a dialogical process, an empowering effect, an understanding towards a client's situation as a whole, collective knowledge creation, and integration into daily social work. The potential of the Mirror method to facilitate critical thinking, enable c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contributes to the well-being of the social workers, the quality of the services and the discovery of new forms of helping the clients. Similar results of gaining new self-understanding, mastery and sense of new choices have been found in other reflective groups (Fook and Askeland, 2006;Fook and Gardner, 2007: 143;Kivipelto and Yliruka, 2012;Nilsen et al, 2011). We propose that Practice and Theory group intervention could accompany these reflective practices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contributes to the well-being of the social workers, the quality of the services and the discovery of new forms of helping the clients. Similar results of gaining new self-understanding, mastery and sense of new choices have been found in other reflective groups (Fook and Askeland, 2006;Fook and Gardner, 2007: 143;Kivipelto and Yliruka, 2012;Nilsen et al, 2011). We propose that Practice and Theory group intervention could accompany these reflective practices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In the group, taking a piece of research as a starting point for reflection differs from other reflective group models (Fook and Gardner, 2007; Kivipelto and Yliruka, 2012; Nilsen et al., 2011) and from external group supervision provided to Finnish social workers regularly. Although theoretical knowledge initiates the reflection, theory is not privileged over practice.…”
Section: The Pilot Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%