MIRAGE: Model description and evaluation of aerosols and trace gases

Abstract

[1] The Model for Integrated Research on Atmospheric Global Exchanges (MIRAGE) modeling system, designed to study the impacts of anthropogenic aerosols on the global environment, is described. MIRAGE consists of a chemical transport model coupled online with a global climate model. The chemical transport model simulates trace gases, aerosol number, and aerosol chemical component mass (sulfate, methane sulfonic acid (MSA), organic matter, black carbon (BC), sea salt, and mineral dust) for four aerosol modes (Aitken, accumulation, coarse sea salt, and coarse mineral dust) using the modal aerosol dynamics approach. Cloud-phase and interstitial aerosol are predicted separately. The climate model, based on Community Climate Model, Version 2 (CCM2), has physically based treatments of aerosol direct and indirect forcing. Stratiform cloud water and droplet number are simulated using a bulk microphysics parameterization that includes aerosol activation. Aerosol and trace gas species simulated by MIRAGE are presented and evaluated using surface and aircraft measurements. Surface-level SO 2 in North American and European source regions is higher than observed. SO 2 above the boundary layer is in better agreement with observations, and surface-level SO 2 at marine locations is somewhat lower than observed. Comparison with other models suggests insufficient SO 2 dry deposition; increasing the deposition velocity improves simulated SO 2 . Surface-level sulfate in North American and European source regions is in good agreement with observations, although the seasonal cycle in Europe is stronger than observed. Surface-level sulfate at high-latitude and marine locations, and sulfate above the boundary layer, are higher than observed. This is attributed primarily to insufficient wet removal; increasing the wet removal improves simulated sulfate at remote locations and aloft. Because of the high sulfate bias, radiative forcing estimates for anthropogenic sulfur given in 2001 by S. J. Ghan and colleagues are probably too high. Surface-level dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is $40% higher than observed, and the seasonal cycle shows too much DMS in local winter, partially caused by neglect of oxidation by NO 3 . Surface-level MSA at marine locations is $80% higher than observed, also attributed to insufficient wet removal. Surface-level BC is $50% lower than observed in the United States and $40% lower than observed globally. Treating BC as initially hydrophobic would lessen this bias. Surface-level organic matter is lower than observed in the United States, similar to BC, but shows no bias in the global comparison. Surface-level sea salt concentrations are $30% lower than observed, partly caused by low temporal variance of the model's 10 m wind speeds. Submicrometer sea salt is strongly underestimated by the emissions parameterization. Dust concentrations are within a factor of 3 at most sites but tend to be lower than observed, primarily because of neglect of very large particles and underestimation of emissions and vertical transport under ...

Assessment of Madden–Julian oscillation simulations with various configurations of CESM

“…The revised cloud macrophysics scheme provides a more transparent treatment of cloud processes and imposes a pseudo condensation-evaporation process to remove the inconsistency between stratus fraction and in-stratus cloud condensate (Neale et al 2010a). The aerosol treatment in the model uses a modal-based prognostic scheme similar to that in Easter et al (2004), but with only three modes (Aitken, accumulation and coarse) (Liu et al 2012), whereas CAM4 uses a prescribed mass-based scheme with direct radiative effects and has no interaction with clouds.…”

Impacts of Additional HONO Sources on Concentrations and Deposition of NO_y in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China

“…Dry deposition of trace gases and particles is calculated by multiplying concentrations in the lowest model layer by the spatially and temporally varying dry deposition velocity (V d ) (Wesley 1989). Wet deposition includes in-and below-cloud removal (Easter et al 2004).…”

Consistent response of Indian summer monsoon to Middle East dust in observations and simulations

“…The removal rate of cloud-borne aerosols and trace gases is approximately identical to the removal rate of cloud water by precipitation, which is calculated by a microphysics scheme in the model (e.g., Lin microphysics scheme). Below-cloud scavenging of aerosols and trace gases by precipitation are also treated following Easter et al (2004).…”