1977
DOI: 10.1086/154957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mira variables, mass loss, and the fate of red giant stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present sample is naturally biased towards stars with low circumstellar extinction because the Tc lines are located in the blue spectral range, so that stars in the late superwind phase of the AGB are missing. Also, most sample stars have periods shorter than 500 d. It is known that the number density of optically visible Mira variables drops sharply between P = 425 and 500 d (Wood & Cahn 1977).…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present sample is naturally biased towards stars with low circumstellar extinction because the Tc lines are located in the blue spectral range, so that stars in the late superwind phase of the AGB are missing. Also, most sample stars have periods shorter than 500 d. It is known that the number density of optically visible Mira variables drops sharply between P = 425 and 500 d (Wood & Cahn 1977).…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this happens the envelope is rapidly ejected Tsuperwind regime) and the AGB phase is terminated (Wood and Cahn 1977;Iben and Truran 1978;Renzini and Voli 1981;Ren zini 198la,b;Iben and Renzini 1982). During the superwind regime M e is rapidly decreasing, and when another critical value of the envelope mass is reached (M J the star begins to depart from the AGB, moving to available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.…”
Section: Low Mass Wolf-rayet Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with progenitor masses above « l^.gup to M w t>, must go through the PN stage, and until there is evidence against it, we shall use this as a working hypothesis. I should mention in this context that the evolutionary scheme proposed and discussed by Wood and Cahn (1977) and Cahn and Wyatt (1978) which evaluates information about the Mira period-distribution -with Miras again considered as immediate progenitors of PN stages -leads to the conclusion that stars below 1.25>l 0 do not go through a PN stage but evolve directly into white dwarfs by steady mass loss. Similarly, calculations of evolution with steady mass loss according to the Reimers formula, through the double-shell burning stage into the white dwarf region -by Schonberner (1979) in Kiel -indicate that stars below 1.4>f e may lose their envelopes by stellar winds only.…”
Section: Planetary Nebulaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This qualitative picture, so far, has been known and accepted for some time, and was first incorporated into a quantitative study of galactic evolution by Ostriker and coworkers (Thuan et al, 1975). During the last years, however, it has become evident that mass loss plays a much more important role than anticipated, both steady and unsteady, in stellar winds and/or planetary nebulae (see Reimers,1975, Weidemann 1977a, Wood and Cahn, 1977, Renzini, 1979. Recent investigations about white dwarf members in open clusters (Romanishin and Angel, 1979) have shown that progenitor masses for white dwarf production may be as high as 1H 9 with a stringent lower limit of 5 M 9 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%