Miocene structural inversion of the Adjara-Trialeti back-arc basin as a far-field effect of the Arabia-Eurasia collision

Abstract

<p>Young back-arc rift basins, because of the not yet dissipated extensional thermal signature, can be easily inverted following changes in the geodynamic regime and/or far-field stress transmission. Structural inversion of such basins mainly develops through reactivation of normal faults, particularly if the latter are favourably oriented with respect to the direction of stress transfer. The Adjara-Trialeti fold-and-thrust belt of SW Georgia is an example of this mechanism, resulting from the structural inversion of a continental back-arc rift basin developed on the upper plate of the northern Neotethys slab in Paleogene times, behind the Pontides-Lesser Caucasus magmatic arc. New low-temperature thermochronological data [apatite fission-track (AFT) and (U-Th)/He (AHe) analyses] were obtained from a number of samples, collected across the Adjara-Trialeti belt from the former sedimentary fill of the basin and from syn-rift plutons. AFT central ages range between 46 and 15 Ma, while AHe ages cluster mainly between 10 and 3 Ma. Thermal modelling, integrating AFT and AHe data with independent geological constraints (e.g. depositional/intrusion age, other geochronological data, thermal maturity indicators and stratigraphic relationships), clearly indicates that the Adjara-Trialeti back-arc basin was inverted starting from the late Middle Miocene, at 14-10 Ma. This result is corroborated by many independent geological evidences, found for example in the adjacent Rioni, Kartli and Kura foreland basins and in the eastern Black Sea offshore, which all suggest a Middle-Late Miocene phase of deformation linked with the Adjara-Trialeti FTB building. Adjara-Trialeti structural inversion can be associated with the widespread Middle-to-Late Miocene phase of shortening and exhumation that is recognised from the eastern Pontides to the Lesser Caucasus, the Talysh and the Alborz ranges. This tectonic phase can in turn be interpreted as a far-field effect of the Arabia-Eurasia collision, developed along the Bitlis suture hundreds of kilometres to the south.</p>

The role of mantle upwelling on the thermal history of theTertiary‐PiedmontBasin at theAlps‐Apenninestectonic boundary

“…Significant and spatially extensive deviations from a steadystate thermal configuration are often difficult to detect in the basin due to the smoothing effect of heat diffusion in crustal rocks and the low thermal conductivity of the sedimentary rocks. Despite these challenges, constraining timeintegrated thermal histories is crucial for understanding diagenetic processes, hydrocarbon generation and migrations, as well as large-scale tectonic and geodynamic processes (Ceriani et al, 2021;Corrado et al, 2020;Di Giulio et al, 2021;Gusmeo et al, 2021;Schneider & Issler, 2019). For instance, studies of sedimentary basins from the Alps (Mazurek et al, 2006) and Apennines (Cibin et al, 2003;Zattin et al, 2000) have shown how tectonic and magmatic processes can affect the burial history and result in multiple thermal events with diverse intensity, age, and duration that are difficult to disentangle.…”