1999
DOI: 10.1029/1999jb900086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miocene clockwise rotation of southwest Japan and formation of curvature of the Median Tectonic Line: Paleomagnetic implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Takahashi and Saito, 1997;, 1999;Otofuji et al, 19991980Itoh, 1986, 1988Hyodo and Niistuma, 1986;Takahashi and Nomura, 1989;, 1992;Takahashi and Watanabe, 1993;Hayashida, 1994;Takahashi and Saito, 1997;Otofuji et al, 1999;Itoh et al, 2006 MTL 80 Niitsuma andAkiba, 1985;Niitsuma and Matsuda, 1985;Hyodo and Niitsuma, 1986;Niistuma, 1989 6 Ma MTL Niitsuma, 1989 Takahashi and Saito 1997 Hyodo and Niitsuma, 1986;Takahashi and Watanabe, 1993 16 Ma 6 Ma (Hayashida and Ito, 1984); 2 = lower part of the Morozaki Group (Hayashida, 1986); 3 = Kani Group (Hayashida et al, 1991); 4 = Mizunami Group ; 5 = Hokusetsu Subgroup (Torii, 1983); 6 = Tomikusa Group (Hayashida, 1992); 7 = Kurami and Saigo groups (Hayashida, 1994); 8 = Chichibu basin sediments (Hyodo and Niitsuma, 1986). Accreted volcano-sedimentary units (Amano et al, 1999;Aoike, 1999) that initially formed on the Izu-Bonin Arc are also shown: K = Kushigatayama or Koma unit; M = Misaka unit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Takahashi and Saito, 1997;, 1999;Otofuji et al, 19991980Itoh, 1986, 1988Hyodo and Niistuma, 1986;Takahashi and Nomura, 1989;, 1992;Takahashi and Watanabe, 1993;Hayashida, 1994;Takahashi and Saito, 1997;Otofuji et al, 1999;Itoh et al, 2006 MTL 80 Niitsuma andAkiba, 1985;Niitsuma and Matsuda, 1985;Hyodo and Niitsuma, 1986;Niistuma, 1989 6 Ma MTL Niitsuma, 1989 Takahashi and Saito 1997 Hyodo and Niitsuma, 1986;Takahashi and Watanabe, 1993 16 Ma 6 Ma (Hayashida and Ito, 1984); 2 = lower part of the Morozaki Group (Hayashida, 1986); 3 = Kani Group (Hayashida et al, 1991); 4 = Mizunami Group ; 5 = Hokusetsu Subgroup (Torii, 1983); 6 = Tomikusa Group (Hayashida, 1992); 7 = Kurami and Saigo groups (Hayashida, 1994); 8 = Chichibu basin sediments (Hyodo and Niitsuma, 1986). Accreted volcano-sedimentary units (Amano et al, 1999;Aoike, 1999) that initially formed on the Izu-Bonin Arc are also shown: K = Kushigatayama or Koma unit; M = Misaka unit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Previous paleomagnetic studies have dealt with the formation of the curvature and suggested that differential rotation of the Tokai and Hokuriku districts with respect to the central part of the southwest Japan arc (western Honshu including the San'in district) caused the curvature (Itoh, 1988;Itoh and Ito, 1989;Otofuji et al, 1999). However, the timing of the differential rotation has not been determined precisely because of the scarcity of Middle Miocene or younger paleomagnetic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the southwest Japan arc, differential rotation of its eastern part including the Tokai and Hokuriku districts with respect to its central part including the San'in district has been documented (Itoh, 1988;Itoh and Ito, 1989;Otofuji et al, 1999). Paleomagnetic poles from Tokai and San'in are summarized in Table 2 and shown in Fig.…”
Section: Tectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Nohi area (Fig. 1), which is located between the Yatsuo and the Mizunami area, Otofuji et al (1999) also suggested differential rotaion during the Miocene based on the paleomagnetic data obtained from Cretaceous to Paleogene welded tuff. In order to examine spatial difference in more various areas relative to the Yatsuo area, further investigation of precise age assignment in compared area is still necessary.…”
Section: Rotation During a Short Interval Around The Late Early Miocenementioning
confidence: 99%