1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(97)00110-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minute findings of inner ear anomalies by three-dimensional CT scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computerized tomography and SCT have been proved powerful tools in imaging the middle and inner ear because they are capable of providing clear images of high-density and high-contrast tissue such as the bone labyrinth, the auditory ossicle and the internal acoustic meatus. However, neither one can generate images of the soft tissue simultaneously including the membrane labyrinth, lymph and nerve (Hermans et al 1995;Isono et al 1997;Shibata and Nagano et al 1996;Himi et al 1996;Hu 1999). Although MRI, to some extent, can compensate uniquely by imaging the soft tissue, it cannot gather the intact information of the cochlea (Barbara et al 1996;Dahm et al 1997;Nakashima et al 2002;Neri et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computerized tomography and SCT have been proved powerful tools in imaging the middle and inner ear because they are capable of providing clear images of high-density and high-contrast tissue such as the bone labyrinth, the auditory ossicle and the internal acoustic meatus. However, neither one can generate images of the soft tissue simultaneously including the membrane labyrinth, lymph and nerve (Hermans et al 1995;Isono et al 1997;Shibata and Nagano et al 1996;Himi et al 1996;Hu 1999). Although MRI, to some extent, can compensate uniquely by imaging the soft tissue, it cannot gather the intact information of the cochlea (Barbara et al 1996;Dahm et al 1997;Nakashima et al 2002;Neri et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning with plain X-ray, technology in the field of diagnostic imaging developed from multidirectional tomography to high-resolution CT of the temporal bone and then MRI, enabling the detailed visualization of inner ear structures (5,6). There have also been reports of applying three-dimensional CT to diagnose subtle inner ear malformations, which could not be detected by two-dimensional examination (7,8). However, the disadvantage of X-ray images of the inner ear is they do not reflect beyond the bony labyrinth and they do not depict the membranous labyrinth, the natural statoacoustic organ.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normal range for the diameter of the endolymphatic duct would be 0.1-1.4 mm [9]. Perhaps three-dimensional imaging techniques will bring the answer in the future [10].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%