“…With the explosion of scholarship in LL research currently, (Bolton, ; Mensel et al ; Simon ; Weber & Horner ; Blommaert ), why should we care to include the big research foresights of a petite‐sized female linguist such as Yamuna Kachru? The answer: for theoretical reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why is her research on the subject so revolutionary one might ask? One reason could be that unlike most of the research in LL which has recently been flawed by a predominantly reductive focus; an essentialized quantification and correlation, indeed, an enumerative counting of language, linguistic variety and linguistic occurrence so to speak (Mensel et al : 320), her approach argues for a necessary analysis of the why of cultural context in which such signage is both produced and received. Kachru did then what LL researchers are only doing now.…”
The current paper pays intellectual homage to a prolific scholar whose contributions to world Englishes need formal acknowledgement. Current linguistic landscape research it is argued stands to gain from Yamuna Kachru's timely theorizations. This paper situates Kachru's forty-six year-research within the chronoscope of her own evolving scholarly career to demonstrate the provocative implications of her brand of research. Her theorizations stand poised to re-revolutionize the field's acknowledgement of linguistic rights particularly in regard to peripherally acknowledged, yet semiotically salient variables of pertinence to current research namely, context, culture and class which her research assiduously, indeed, meticulously sought to study.
“…With the explosion of scholarship in LL research currently, (Bolton, ; Mensel et al ; Simon ; Weber & Horner ; Blommaert ), why should we care to include the big research foresights of a petite‐sized female linguist such as Yamuna Kachru? The answer: for theoretical reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why is her research on the subject so revolutionary one might ask? One reason could be that unlike most of the research in LL which has recently been flawed by a predominantly reductive focus; an essentialized quantification and correlation, indeed, an enumerative counting of language, linguistic variety and linguistic occurrence so to speak (Mensel et al : 320), her approach argues for a necessary analysis of the why of cultural context in which such signage is both produced and received. Kachru did then what LL researchers are only doing now.…”
The current paper pays intellectual homage to a prolific scholar whose contributions to world Englishes need formal acknowledgement. Current linguistic landscape research it is argued stands to gain from Yamuna Kachru's timely theorizations. This paper situates Kachru's forty-six year-research within the chronoscope of her own evolving scholarly career to demonstrate the provocative implications of her brand of research. Her theorizations stand poised to re-revolutionize the field's acknowledgement of linguistic rights particularly in regard to peripherally acknowledged, yet semiotically salient variables of pertinence to current research namely, context, culture and class which her research assiduously, indeed, meticulously sought to study.
“…Understanding significant historical events involving different language groups within a country may help to clarify the reasoning behind particular national language policies and practices. The perceived (and bestowed) power among different groups within a given country reflects the public displays and uses of language as characterised by the LL (Van Mensel et al, 2012). We argue that the language ideologies represented by a country's or region's LL are more fully understood with the consideration of the sociohistorical landscape, which may include political coups, successions, wide-sweeping language reforms and the like.…”
Section: Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burgeoning interest in the impact of publically displayed and valued language has been framed most widely as the study of the Linguistic Landscape (LL; Gorter, 2006;Gorter, Marten, & Van Mensel, 2012;Landry & Bourhis, 1997;Shohamy & Gorter, 2009). The LL specifically refers to the interest in understanding the influences, beliefs about and uses of language in public spaces (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These language-specific attitudes may stem from historical conditions influenced by tensions and conflict among member groups defined by differing languages and cultural identities (e.g. Huebner, 2006;Puzey, 2012;Van Mensel, Marten, & Gorter, 2012). For schools, language ideologies may affect the quality of curricular materials (e.g.…”
Social psychologists have suggested that language-based ideologies related to 'stereotype threat' (i.e. variations in performance-based on ability perceptions of language groups) may affect students' academic achievement regardless of school language support. However, it is unclear whether efforts to support students' first language development, particularly for large populations of students whose primary language is not the dominant language, is sufficient for 'levelling the playing field' in terms of academic achievement. We analysed subsets of data from the 2011 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study and the 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment to investigate the by-country effects of officially recognised languages on reading performance. Participants represent countries with only two official languages (e.g. Canada, Israel) and primarily used one of these languages at home. Preliminary findings from hierarchical linear modelling show that the dominant official language predicts reading performance unless the minority language reflects a language internationally valued and revered by local stake holders (e.g. English in the United Arab Emirates). Implications suggest that educational resources and programmes should be sensitive to the historical context of country-specific language ideologies and related stereotypical perceptions that favour the dominant language within the school context.
The field of Linguistic Landscape (LL) studies has as its focus the representation of language (or languages) in public space. Its main object of inquiry is 'signs', that is, visible written attestations of language and how people-those who read and those who produce -interact with these signs. In this chapter, our aim is to illustrate how the study of LL can contribute to a further understanding of minority languages. Before we move onto these illustrations, we briefly wish to outline why LL studies can offer a particular lens for minority language research that can be highly illuminating.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.