2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-019-02457-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minor structural modifications of bisphenol A strongly affect physiological responses of HepG2 cells

Abstract: Bisphenols represent a large group of structurally similar compounds. In contrast to bisphenol A (BPA) and bisphenol S (BPS), however, toxicological data are usually scarce, thus making bisphenols an ideal candidate for read-across assessments. BPA, bisphenol C (BPC) and a newly synthesized bisphenol A/C (BPA/C) differ only by one methyl group attached to the phenolic ring. Their EC 50 values for cytotoxicity and logP OW values are comparable. However, the estrogenic activities of these bisphenols are not comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that the bisphenols with larger/bulkier side chains are more efficacious and that relatively small molecular differences between the bisphenols can alter their effects significantly ( Table 1). This is in line with a previous study showing that the read-across approach was non-applicable for otherwise structurally comparable bisphenols (45). Interestingly, low doses of BPAF, BPB, BPF, BPS, and BPA have all been shown to induce Ca 2+ signals in SKBR3 cells via the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) (46), with BPAF and BPB being more efficacious than BPF, BPS, and BPA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It seems that the bisphenols with larger/bulkier side chains are more efficacious and that relatively small molecular differences between the bisphenols can alter their effects significantly ( Table 1). This is in line with a previous study showing that the read-across approach was non-applicable for otherwise structurally comparable bisphenols (45). Interestingly, low doses of BPAF, BPB, BPF, BPS, and BPA have all been shown to induce Ca 2+ signals in SKBR3 cells via the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) (46), with BPAF and BPB being more efficacious than BPF, BPS, and BPA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, we evaluated the potential relationship between the log octanol–water partition coefficient (logP) and logLC50 values for all compounds that elicited an effect on cell viability (18 alternatives + BPA) and determined that there was an inverse linear relationship (Figure 1; r 2 = 0.745; p = 0.49 –07 ). Thus, cytotoxicity increased with decreasing water solubility (i.e., higher logP), which was comparable with a finding reported by Padberg et al (2019). Compounds with logP > 5 would be expected to permeate the lipid‐rich plasma membrane more easily (Yang and Hinner 2015) to exert effects.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Including RNA from cells that have entered the cell death pathway can confound results when evaluating intracellular signaling. For example, human serum BPA levels are estimated at 0.002-0.004 μM, but in some reported datasets, BPA was tested in HepG2 cells up to 200 mM [41,42]. The half maximal concentration of BPA when evaluating 24 h cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells was demonstrated to be 261 μM, suggesting that gene expression studies performed with HepG2 cells treated for 48 h with millimolar concentrations may reflect the induction of cell death rather than endocrine disrupting activities [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, human serum BPA levels are estimated at 0.002-0.004 μM, but in some reported datasets, BPA was tested in HepG2 cells up to 200 mM [41,42]. The half maximal concentration of BPA when evaluating 24 h cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells was demonstrated to be 261 μM, suggesting that gene expression studies performed with HepG2 cells treated for 48 h with millimolar concentrations may reflect the induction of cell death rather than endocrine disrupting activities [42]. Another important consideration when determining the physiological effect of EDCs is the in vivo metabolism of environmental chemicals into conjugated forms, which can alter their bioactivity [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%