2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-3794(00)00034-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minor parties and protest votes in Australia and New Zealand: locating populist politics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When attempting to account for the increased relevance of minor parties, academics have advanced several explanations. Some interpret the rise of minor parties as primarily an outlet of voters' dissatisfaction with existing political choice and/or the functioning of the political system more broadly (Belanger 2004;Denemark and Bowler 2002;Poguntke 1996). Belanger argues that whereas the former attitude (i.e.…”
Section: The Growing Significance Of Minor Partiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When attempting to account for the increased relevance of minor parties, academics have advanced several explanations. Some interpret the rise of minor parties as primarily an outlet of voters' dissatisfaction with existing political choice and/or the functioning of the political system more broadly (Belanger 2004;Denemark and Bowler 2002;Poguntke 1996). Belanger argues that whereas the former attitude (i.e.…”
Section: The Growing Significance Of Minor Partiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rigid division between politics and the affective has led to attempts in political science to model a 'populist attitude', in order to section off and account for how the emotional rises to the surface in voter behaviour, when the coherent pragmatic subject should be acting in their own rational interests (Denemark & Bowler 2002;Rooduijn 2014). Denemark & Bowler (2002), in comparing the rise of One Nation Party in Australia and New Zealand First, categorise those parties as associated with 'extremist' issues such as immigration and aid for indigenous minorities.…”
Section: Populism As Irrational and Dangerous: A Continuation Of Two mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denemark & Bowler (2002), in comparing the rise of One Nation Party in Australia and New Zealand First, categorise those parties as associated with 'extremist' issues such as immigration and aid for indigenous minorities. Thus, a voter attitude that supports these parties is related to a new form of politics; one that is distinct from the rational materialism of the 'major' parties of left and right, and which is guided by the negative emotions of fear and aggression.…”
Section: Populism As Irrational and Dangerous: A Continuation Of Two mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In attempting to explain an apparently anomalous high probability of being postmaterialist for ONP supporters at the 1998 House of Representatives election, Denemark and Bowler (2002) suggest that national identity is still a non-materialist concern, although it is not among Inglehart's materialist-postmaterialist items. As noted above, while Inglehart argues that the postmodern dimension of politics is strongly associated with the postmaterialism-materialism divide, he does also recognise that a broader consideration of postmodern politics will sometimes be necessary.…”
Section: Postmodernismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of the earliest significant analyses, Gow (1990: 60) uses data from the 1990 Australian Election Study (McAllister et al 1990) to argue that "by and large, there is no regular pattern of differences between the two polar Charnock (1999) and Denemark and Bowler (2002), and later in this paper. In what follows, we will relate our work to some of the previous Australian research mentioned above by beginning with an examination of the relationships between voting and measures of postmaterialism, but will later extend our analysis to include a broader consideration of postmodern politics.…”
Section: Australian Political Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%