2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mink3 × S3 solutions of type II supergravity

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having such spinors we shall then find every solution with an S 3 × S 3 factor consistent with them. This follows the line of reasoning of the earlier works [33][34][35][36][37], where many of the technical details exploited here were originally worked out. Here it will be possible to give the explicit local form of every type II solution consistent with the SO(4) spinor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having such spinors we shall then find every solution with an S 3 × S 3 factor consistent with them. This follows the line of reasoning of the earlier works [33][34][35][36][37], where many of the technical details exploited here were originally worked out. Here it will be possible to give the explicit local form of every type II solution consistent with the SO(4) spinor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This time ν |ν| = ±1 parametrise a spinor charged under the SU(2) L/R subgroup of SO(4) ∼ = SU(2) L ×SU(2) R that are singlets under the SU(2) R/L . As shown in [34], in the Hopf fibration frame of We parametrise these in a unified language as K i such that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for a = 1, 2. Here a 1,2 are SU(2) doublets on S 3 1,2 (see [37] for details) defined in terms of the 3-sphere Killing spinors as The SO(4) R-symmetry is embedded in SO(4)×SO(4) as follows: the 3-sphere S 3 1,2 admits a global SO(4) 1,2 ∼SU(2) 1,2+ × SU(2) 1,2,− isometry. Let us assume for simplicity that = 1 5 so that 1,2 is charged under SU(2) 1,2+ , the SO(4) R-symmetry is then…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is computed in [37]. This is necessary in the derivation of Ψ ± which decomposes as in terms of wedge products of bispinors on the two S 3 and the interval direction.…”
Section: Partially Breaking  = (4 0) With An S 3 ×S 3 Fibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most progress constructing compact solutions with fluxes has happened within another restrictive ansatz, with the internal space assumed to be conformally a holonomy manifold [21][22][23], allowing one to broadly use the same mathematical tools as before. At this point all Mink d solutions for d > 1 (with the exception of Mink 2 in eleven dimensions) have been classified (see [24][25][26][27][28] for eleven dimensions, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] for ten dimensions), however finding solutions beyond the ansatz of warped holonomy has proved challenging -see [38,39] for success in this direction. The issue appears to be one of tractability, so it would be helpful to have some additional guiding principle.AdS solutions necessitate the inclusion of fluxes, early examples were also constructed by studying warped holonomy manifolds (albeit now non compact) using the Freund-Rubin ansatz [40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%