2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minipotentiostat controlled by smartphone on a micropipette: A versatile, portable, agile and accurate tool for electroanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cyclic voltammetry in a [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3–/4– solution is essential for validating the capacity of the equipment to conduct electrochemical techniques [ 8 , 10 , 13 , 16 , 24 ]. Therefore, this technique was used to compare Paqari Stat and a commercial potentiostat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cyclic voltammetry in a [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3–/4– solution is essential for validating the capacity of the equipment to conduct electrochemical techniques [ 8 , 10 , 13 , 16 , 24 ]. Therefore, this technique was used to compare Paqari Stat and a commercial potentiostat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open-source tools have helped develop this kind of educational, scientific instrumentation [ 14 , 15 ]. For instance, Arduino microcontroller boards have expanded the functionality of electronic-controlled potentiostats [ 13 , 16 ], allowing an increment in the number of methodologies addressed with these while maintaining an affordable price. The spread and the increasing capacity of smartphones have provided a portable and affordable platform for several applications in the electrochemical field [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, FDM was successfully utilized in printing of carbonaceous conductive substrates like carbon black, graphene, or carbon nanotubes mixed with thermoplastic materials [35]. Printing conductive materials paved the way for 3D printing of electronic components [36], integrated electrochemical sensors [37], and batteries [38]. FDM suffers from several drawbacks associated with low printing resolution (~5 µm), relatively high energy requirements, hazardous vapors, and adhesion problems with multi-materials printing [39].…”
Section: Fused Deposition Modeling (Fdm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By way of example, incorporating a conductive electrode material into a 3D printed sensor using fused deposition modeling require using conductive carbonaceous filaments that can be printed onto conventional nonconductive filaments. Although achievable [37], this process is quite complex and require extensive optimization of the printing parameters to avoid leakage and/or structure deformity. In addition, common 3D printing techniques and materials have limited compatibility with biomolecules especially with high energy required for printing processes, like high heat in FDM and high energy laser in stereolithographic 3D printing, that prevent direct printing of these biomolecules.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%