2013
DOI: 10.1002/0471140856.tx0111s56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minipigs: Applications in Toxicology

Abstract: Minipigs are accepted models for a variety of drug preclinical and nonregulatory toxicology studies. Acute, subchronic and chronic studies are possible using all routes of administration. Minipigs have distinct size advantages over domestic pigs. There exist some minor limitations with minipigs, but for the most part they offer well correlated models to humans for dermal and systemic toxicology assessments. Phototoxicology and reproductive toxicology usage is expanding. Minipig size, anatomy, physiology, metab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Swine have been used extensively in dermal research because of the comparability of their integument to that of humans. During the past half century, they have been used in preclinical dermal toxicology, dermal pharmacokinetics, dermal phototoxicity, dermal wound healing studies, and a broad array of other biomedical research applications (Brown, Stricker-Krongrad, and Bouchard 2013;Gad, Stricker-Krongrad, and Skaanild 2015). Reviews of the use of swine in such studies have been previously published (Fujii et al 1997;Gad, Stricker-Krongrad, and Skaanild 2015;Monteiro-Riviere and Riviere 1996;M.…”
Section: Dermal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Swine have been used extensively in dermal research because of the comparability of their integument to that of humans. During the past half century, they have been used in preclinical dermal toxicology, dermal pharmacokinetics, dermal phototoxicity, dermal wound healing studies, and a broad array of other biomedical research applications (Brown, Stricker-Krongrad, and Bouchard 2013;Gad, Stricker-Krongrad, and Skaanild 2015). Reviews of the use of swine in such studies have been previously published (Fujii et al 1997;Gad, Stricker-Krongrad, and Skaanild 2015;Monteiro-Riviere and Riviere 1996;M.…”
Section: Dermal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these miniature breeds allows investigators to conduct experiments in mature (rather than pediatric) animals with a consistent size and health status. Each breed may be utilized in some aspect of dermal toxicology (Brown, Stricker-Krongrad, and Bouchard 2013;Gad, Stricker-Krongrad, and Skaanild 2015;Svendsen 2006; M. M. Swindle et al 2012). The value of miniature swine dermal models for preclinical safety is confirmed by Ganderup (2012) who reviewed miniature swine safety and efficacy data on 43 marketed drugs with previously reported adverse responses.…”
Section: Dermal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miniature swine size, anatomy, physiology, metabolism, and genetics correlate well with human factors. They are also becoming even more attractive as a nonrodent species for general toxicity studies as a result of the increase in expense in the use of dogs and the perceived lay opposition to the use of dogs in research (Brown et al 2013). They have been extensively used for physiological research, primarily cardiovascular, renal, and digestive (Gad et al 2015;Khan 1984), and surgical research (Swindle et al 1988) for years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the pig as a nonrodent model in toxicological studies continues to grow. It has been reported that in 2008, over 500 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) reviews using minipigs had been filed within the previous 5 years (Brown, Stricker-Kongrad, and Bouchard 2013). The advent of the increased availability of minipigs, coupled with the knowledge that the physiology of the pig is more similar to humans than is the mouse, has led to an increased utilization of pigs in the biomedical sciences (Freeman et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%