2011
DOI: 10.1179/1743286311y.0000000012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining of orebodies under shear loading Part 1 – case histories

Abstract: The conditions for rockbursts occurrence are traditionally identified as: high stress, high extraction ratio, strong brittle rocks, folding, faulting and unfavourable excavation geometry. Some rockbursts cannot be explained by any one or a combination of these factors. Salamon (1983) stated that a disconcerting feature of rockbursts is that they defy conventional explanation. Based on detailed review of case histories, this paper identifies oblique loading of orebodies by the major far field principal stress a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figures 8,9,11, and 12 microcracks propagate more from the outside of the pillar towards the pillar core and the bearing capacity also increases with increasing pillar size as shown in Figures 7, 10, and 13. In these figures the pillar strengths are 32.8 MPa, 33.2 MPa, and 34.2 MPa for pillar W/H ratios of 0.5, 1, and 1.5, respectively.…”
Section: Failure Characteristics Of Vertical Pillars With Differentmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figures 8,9,11, and 12 microcracks propagate more from the outside of the pillar towards the pillar core and the bearing capacity also increases with increasing pillar size as shown in Figures 7, 10, and 13. In these figures the pillar strengths are 32.8 MPa, 33.2 MPa, and 34.2 MPa for pillar W/H ratios of 0.5, 1, and 1.5, respectively.…”
Section: Failure Characteristics Of Vertical Pillars With Differentmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Model Overview. Following the procedure used by Suorineni et al [9,10] the effects of pillar dip angle, widthto-height ratio, and a certain stress ratio on the stability of pillars in a room-and-pillar mine are investigated using five width-to-height ratios, namely, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5, at various degrees of orebody inclination, namely, 0 ∘ (Horizontal orebody resulting in vertical pillars), 10 ∘ , 20 ∘ , 30 ∘ , and 40 ∘ (orebody dip angles result in inclined pillars). A typical numerical model setup in RFPA2D is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of Pillars Using Rfpamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pillar inclinations lead to inclined loading conditions, and increasing pillar inclination reduce pillar strength [26,27]. In inclined pillars, the pillar sides towards the dip lead to the pillar failure.…”
Section: Effect Of Pillar Inclinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case studies were only based on one pillar and its failure mechanism, while the strength of the pillar was not evaluated to develop pillars in an inclined fashion. Two-dimensional finite-element numerical studies were conducted to evaluate the strength of hard-rock pillars under far-field principal stresses at different orientations, and it was concluded that the strength of the pillars with higher W/H ratios was highly affected by the orientation of the pillars [17,18]. Jessu and Spearing [19] conducted similar numerical studies to that of Suorineni [18] but with a finite difference code in a three-dimensional model to evaluate the strength and the failure mechanisms of pillars at different inclinations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%