2016
DOI: 10.1080/13875868.2016.1246553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining nearness relations from an n-grams Web corpus in geographical space

Abstract: Interacting with spatial data effectively requires systems that not only process references to locations, but understand spatial natural language. Empirical research has demonstrated that near is vague, asymmetric and context dependent. We explore near in language using Microsoft Web n-grams for expressions of the form A near *, where A are placenames referring to different spatial granularities, ranging from points of interest to large U.S. cities and * are autocomplete suggestions for placenames. Analyzing t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to research in GIR, we emphasise the importance of understanding ways in which other disciplines can provide theory and empirical inputs to research. For instance, systems which seek to implement methods with respect to vague spatial relationships such as near can usefully gain by understanding ways in which vagueness has been conceptualised (e.g., Fisher, 2000), explored in language and cognition (e.g., Levinson, 2003b), represented computationally (e.g., Cohn and Gotts, 1996) and analysed (e.g., Derungs and Purves, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to research in GIR, we emphasise the importance of understanding ways in which other disciplines can provide theory and empirical inputs to research. For instance, systems which seek to implement methods with respect to vague spatial relationships such as near can usefully gain by understanding ways in which vagueness has been conceptualised (e.g., Fisher, 2000), explored in language and cognition (e.g., Levinson, 2003b), represented computationally (e.g., Cohn and Gotts, 1996) and analysed (e.g., Derungs and Purves, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In natural language texts, spatial relations are usually specified qualitatively using spatial expressions such as at, close to, to the left of, north of, etc. These expressions convey various spatial relations, whose meaning is often vague and context dependent hindering their automatic extraction and disambiguation [114,115].…”
Section: Geospatial Semantic Information Extraction and Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Place name extraction has been an important topic within the geographic information retrieval community for some time. Jones et al [40] focused on the extraction of place names and vague regions from natural language on websites, while others were able to extract spatial relations from natural language in web documents [41]. In that same thread, additional research has looked at the identification of place names based on their context within descriptive documents [42].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%