2009
DOI: 10.1080/00236560902826063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining memories: reading coalfield autobiographies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown, though, that the collective memory of the past can become subject to a construction of a myth, such as a myth of a heroic miner, which can obscure a more complicated story of the miner (Gildart, 2009), and the interpretation of experiences involves not only sharing memories but also collectively silencing them (Palmberger, 2016). For example, research on neighbourhood exclusion has shown that people rarely referred to conflicts that may have occurred in the past (Buffel et al ., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown, though, that the collective memory of the past can become subject to a construction of a myth, such as a myth of a heroic miner, which can obscure a more complicated story of the miner (Gildart, 2009), and the interpretation of experiences involves not only sharing memories but also collectively silencing them (Palmberger, 2016). For example, research on neighbourhood exclusion has shown that people rarely referred to conflicts that may have occurred in the past (Buffel et al ., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the managers featured in this article came from mining families or coalfield areas and most started out as miners in the industry. Oral history and published autobiographies have offered considerable value to sociologists of work, as well as historians, in studying work identities (Strangleman, 2001; Strangleman and Warren, 2008), with mining providing a particularly rich seam of unpublished and published autobiographies (Gildart, 2009) and substantial oral history collections (McIvor and Johnston, 2007). Capturing the power of such autobiographical sources to provide insights into identity and ideology, Alessandro Portelli (1981: 99) observed: ‘the unique and precious element which oral sources force upon the historian and which no other sources possess in equal measure (unless it be literary ones) is the speaker’s subjectivity: and therefore, if the research is broad and articulated enough, a cross-section of the subjectivity of a social group or class’.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le choc de la confrontation entre mineurs et nouveaux apprentis permet donc d'envisager les enjeux de la masculinité sous un angle complémentaire à celui qui est généralement adopté dans les travaux sur les Bevin Boys : alors que, sur ce plan, ils sont généralement comparés par l'historiographie à la masculinité hégémonique des combattants 14 , nous nous intéressons ici à la confrontation entre Bevin Boys et viri-lité de hard man du mineur. Comme le souligne l'historien des mines Keith Gildart, « les histoires de ceux qui sont non virils, des bullied [ceux qui sont persécutés], des atypiques, n'apparaissent généralement pas dans les pages de l'histoire minière 15 ». Les Bevin Boys se révèlent dès lors particulièrement précieux pour interroger, en miroir, la virilité minière et les contours de la respectabilité dans ce milieu.…”
Section: Ariane Makunclassified