2008
DOI: 10.1504/ijsse.2008.018142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining intelligence data in the benefit of critical infrastructures security: vulnerability modelling, simulation and assessment, system of systems engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a need for a more 'sociosphere' view of the world coupled with the nature of systems and their environment, suggests a need to see system 'wholes' rather than system parts and a more systemic view of the world is "based on an understanding of our fundamental interconnectedness and interdependence, with each other and with all of life" [21] (p. 430). A more succinct characterization of the operating landscape for the 21st century systems is provided [2]:…”
Section: The Nature Of the Operating Landscape For 21st Century Complmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, a need for a more 'sociosphere' view of the world coupled with the nature of systems and their environment, suggests a need to see system 'wholes' rather than system parts and a more systemic view of the world is "based on an understanding of our fundamental interconnectedness and interdependence, with each other and with all of life" [21] (p. 430). A more succinct characterization of the operating landscape for the 21st century systems is provided [2]:…”
Section: The Nature Of the Operating Landscape For 21st Century Complmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operating landscape for systems in the 21st century is characteristically ambiguous, emergent, and uncertain. These characteristics affect the capacity and performance of engineered systems/enterprises including critical systems (e.g., energy and transportation) upon which society must depend [1][2][3][4][5]. In response, there are increasing calls for multidisciplinary approaches capable of confronting the elements of ambiguity, emergence, and uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work in this area (Gheorghe and Vamanu, 2009) generalizes the concept of resiliency in relation to critical infrastructures (e.g. energy infrastructures) by introducing cooperative systems models for quantitative vulnerability assessment for interdependent complex structures.…”
Section: Cooperative Energy Security: Resilient Energy Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let S(i), i = 1, 2, …, M be the variable qualifying the functionality of part i, S(i)= 1 indicating a functional part and S(i) = −1 a dysfunctional part -which accommodates systems within the Ising model as observed in the preceding section (Gheorghe, Vamanu, 2008). Let S(i), i = 1, 2, …, M be the variable qualifying the functionality of part i, S(i)= 1 indicating a functional part and S(i) = −1 a dysfunctional part -which accommodates systems within the Ising model as observed in the preceding section (Gheorghe, Vamanu, 2008).…”
Section: The Things In Depth IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we present a methodological work that embraces a system-of-systems (SoS) framework of analysis [Gheorghe and Vamanu, 2008;Eusgeld et al, 2011;Kröger and Zio, 2011;Tsilipanos et al, 2013] and propose a Hierarchical Graph representation to evaluate the robustness of interdependent CIs, measured by its capability to deliver the required amount of product (e.g., energy, water, etc. ) to the demand nodes of the infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%