Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1646396.1646410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining from large image sets

Abstract: So far, most image mining was based on interactive querying. Although such querying will remain important in the future, several applications need image mining at such wide scales that it has to run automatically. This adds an additional level to the problem, namely to apply appropriate further processing to different types of images, and to decide on such processing automatically as well. This paper touches on those issues in that we discuss the processing of landmark images and of images coming from webcams.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A useful application of object duplicate detection is presented in (Gool, Breitenstein, Gammeter, Grabner, & Quack, 2009). Images coming from webcams on large database are automatically annotated with bounding boxes on object level.…”
Section: Object Duplicate Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A useful application of object duplicate detection is presented in (Gool, Breitenstein, Gammeter, Grabner, & Quack, 2009). Images coming from webcams on large database are automatically annotated with bounding boxes on object level.…”
Section: Object Duplicate Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%