International Laser Safety Conference 2011
DOI: 10.2351/1.5056746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum visible lesion (MVL) thresholds in cynomolgus (Macaca fasicularis) retina resulting from laser exposure at wavelengths of 413-nm, 532-nm and 647-nm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data generated has been incorporated into national and international safety standards such as the International Electrotechnical Commission 60825, and the ANSI Z 136 standards. In generating this data to support the standards, AFRL maintains a vast collection of imagery containing laser damage induced by a broad range of sources 30–32 . This study has provided a significant basis for our understanding of laser bioeffects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data generated has been incorporated into national and international safety standards such as the International Electrotechnical Commission 60825, and the ANSI Z 136 standards. In generating this data to support the standards, AFRL maintains a vast collection of imagery containing laser damage induced by a broad range of sources 30–32 . This study has provided a significant basis for our understanding of laser bioeffects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In generating this data to support the standards, AFRL maintains a vast collection of imagery containing laser damage induced by a broad range of sources. [30][31][32] This study has provided a significant basis for our understanding of laser bioeffects. All retinal fundus images were acquired from Macaca fascicularis or Macaca mulatta subjects.…”
Section: Fundus Image Data Set and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Following these criteria, 43 threshold data have been excluded (from 10 studies): [10,19,57,64,65,66,67,68,69,70] and 253 threshold data published in 31 studies are found applicable to model validation: [10,11,18,19,32,33,53,54,56,57,58,59,60,61,70,71,72,73,74,55,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85].…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%