2001
DOI: 10.1017/s144678870000238x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum sized fibres in distributive lattices

Abstract: A subset F of an ordered set X is a fibre of X if F intersects every maximal antichain of X. We find a lower bound on the function / (£>), the minimum fibre size in the distributive lattice D, in terms of the size of D. In particular, we prove that there is a constant c such that f(D)>c-In the process we show that minimum fibre size is a monotone property for a certain class of distributive lattices. This fact depends upon being able to split every maximal antichain of this class of distributive lattices into … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an earlier paper [4], we found that the splitting property was precisely the idea we needed in our investigation of sizes of minimal fibres of distributive lattices. For other papers on the splitting property, see [2], [5], [6].…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In an earlier paper [4], we found that the splitting property was precisely the idea we needed in our investigation of sizes of minimal fibres of distributive lattices. For other papers on the splitting property, see [2], [5], [6].…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…); we leave the details to Section 3. Dagan et al showed that the bound 1.25 n is tight, by constructing an optimal set of questions of this size for every n. The bound is not tight for fibers of 2 Xn : Luczak improved the lower bound Ω(1.25 n ) to Ω(2 n/3 ) = Ω(1.2599 n ), as described in Duffus and Sands [DS01]. Lonc and Rival conjectured that the optimal size of a fiber of 2 Xn is Θ(2 n/2 ), realized by the collection of all sets comparable with {x 1 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,5,4,3,9,8,11]. Duffus et al [3] proved that τ 2 (P) ≤ 2 3 |P|, while in [11] it was shown that the coefficient 2 3 cannot be improved below 8 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%