2013
DOI: 10.1002/jsid.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum required angular resolution of smartphone displays for the human visual system

Abstract: There has been a rapid increase in the resolution of small-sized and medium-sized displays. This study determines an upper discernible limit for display resolution. A range of resolutions varying from 254-1016 PPI were evaluated using simulated display by 49 subjects at 300 mm viewing distance. The results of the study conclusively show that users can discriminate between 339 and 508 PPI and in many cases between 508 and 1016 PPI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30,31 Indeed in a series of experiments, Spencer et al found that observers could discriminate displays when pixel sizes were smaller than 0.5 arcmin. 32 These experimental findings and anecdotal research with 4K technology indicates that there is great value maintaining full-resolution data via temporal multiplexing in stereo imaging. SEAV OLED technology offers the opportunity to achieve low-crosstalk s3D imagery that retains the native resolution.…”
Section: Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30,31 Indeed in a series of experiments, Spencer et al found that observers could discriminate displays when pixel sizes were smaller than 0.5 arcmin. 32 These experimental findings and anecdotal research with 4K technology indicates that there is great value maintaining full-resolution data via temporal multiplexing in stereo imaging. SEAV OLED technology offers the opportunity to achieve low-crosstalk s3D imagery that retains the native resolution.…”
Section: Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have found that the use of high‐resolution imagery with pixel sizes smaller than 1 arcmin (equivalent to 20/20 acuity) or 0.5 arcmin (equivalent to 20/10) contributes to a greater sense of realism . Indeed in a series of experiments, Spencer et al found that observers could discriminate displays when pixel sizes were smaller than 0.5 arcmin . These experimental findings and anecdotal research with 4K technology indicates that there is great value maintaining full‐resolution data via temporal multiplexing in stereo imaging.…”
Section: Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit of human visual perception for an observer with a visus of one is by definition located at f vis,0 = 30 [cycles/°]. For the special case of a green grating on a black background this cutoff frequency may even be as high as 60 [cycles/°] for foveal vision as reported by Spencer et al [5]. Figure 1 illustrates a typical bandpass characteristic of human contrast sensitivity, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…al. 21 had 49 observers with a mean acuity of 20/16 rank order images according to their quality. With their procedure the best possible image would receive a score of 1 and the worst a score of 8.…”
Section: Asymptotic Performance Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%