2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0317-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum quantity lubrication advantages when applied to insert flank face in milling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shi et al (2016) investigated tool wear behaviors and their effect on machinability in dry high-speed milling of magnesium alloy at high cutting speeds. Werda et al (2017) compared tool life and surface roughness in the milling of X100CrMoV5 mold steel under different lubrication conditions: dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Even though many authors (Diniz and Filho 1999;Caldeirani Filho and Diniz 2002;De Souza et al 2003, 2005De Escalona and Maropoulos 2010;Prasad et al 2011;Houchuan et al 2015;Liu et al 2016;Shi et al 2016;Werda et al 2017) have presented the results of surface roughness studies that take into account tool wear, no solutions to the problem of how to establish a comprehensive correlation of surface roughness, tool wear, and processing time have been advanced from the perspective of managing these settings in automated production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shi et al (2016) investigated tool wear behaviors and their effect on machinability in dry high-speed milling of magnesium alloy at high cutting speeds. Werda et al (2017) compared tool life and surface roughness in the milling of X100CrMoV5 mold steel under different lubrication conditions: dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Even though many authors (Diniz and Filho 1999;Caldeirani Filho and Diniz 2002;De Souza et al 2003, 2005De Escalona and Maropoulos 2010;Prasad et al 2011;Houchuan et al 2015;Liu et al 2016;Shi et al 2016;Werda et al 2017) have presented the results of surface roughness studies that take into account tool wear, no solutions to the problem of how to establish a comprehensive correlation of surface roughness, tool wear, and processing time have been advanced from the perspective of managing these settings in automated production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the research devoted to the study of surface roughness in face milling (Diniz and Filho 1999;Caldeirani Filho and Diniz 2002;De Souza et al 2003, 2005De Escalona and Maropoulos 2010;Prasad et al 2011;Houchuan et al 2015;Liu et al 2016;Shi et al 2016;Werda et al 2017) takes tool wear into account. Diniz and Filho (1999) studied the influence of the relative positions of tool and workpiece on tool life, tool wear, and surface finish in the face milling process, taking tool wear into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in a turning study of SCM440H, the surface roughness of the workpiece was improved by the oil mist supplied to the flank face over a large cutting speed range of 30-300 m min À1 compared to rake face lubrication [20]. Recently, in previous experiments [21], the influence of MQL lubrication position in milling X100CrMoV5 steel has been investigated. Results showed that the efficiency of MQL process was ensured when applied to flank face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the efficiency of MQL process was ensured when applied to flank face. The lubricant penetrated the tool/workpiece interface which led to a lower surface roughness of about 40% and better tool life of 10% compared to MQL applied on rake face [21]. From the above studies, flank face lubrication is generally a better choice than rake face lubrication in turning and in milling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation