2013
DOI: 10.2528/pier13103107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Q for Lossy and Lossless Electrically Small Dipole Antennas

Abstract: Abstract-General expressions for the quality factor (Q) of antennas are minimized to obtain lower-bound formulas for the Q of electrically small, lossy or lossless, combined electric and magnetic dipole antennas confined to an arbitrarily shaped volume. The lowerbound formulas for Q are derived for dipole antennas with specified electric and magnetic dipole moments excited by both electric and magnetic surface currents as well as by electric surface currents alone. With either excitation, separate formulas are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
88
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(86 reference statements)
14
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The D/Q and Q-factor limits for small electric dipole antennas composed of non-magnetic materials are well understood. There are several independent derivations that provide similar results [35,40,43,44,47,114,117,118], see also (5.4) and (6.6) for this case. In addition, many antenna designs are shown to perform close to the bounds, see [6,9,35,43,96] and Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The D/Q and Q-factor limits for small electric dipole antennas composed of non-magnetic materials are well understood. There are several independent derivations that provide similar results [35,40,43,44,47,114,117,118], see also (5.4) and (6.6) for this case. In addition, many antenna designs are shown to perform close to the bounds, see [6,9,35,43,96] and Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Yaghjian and Stuart derived similar bounds on the Q-factor in the limit of small antennas ka 1 using a different technique [118]. These latter bounds were generalized to electric and magnetic currents in [117], see also [73].…”
Section: Background and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Results similar to those introduced in the previous paragraph are derived by Yaghjian and Stuart [118] and using antenna current optimization [47], see also [111,114,117]. This bound is identical to that derived by Thal [110] for small spherical structures (4.5) with electric currents radiating as an electric dipole, i.e.,…”
Section: Forward Scattering Sum Rulesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…14. The general case with electric and magnetic current densities is analyzed in [73,117] and show that electric polarizability dyadic in (6.6) is replaced with the sum of the electric and magnetic polarizability dyadics. The lower bound on the Q-factor for electric dipoles is e.g., [73,117] Q ≥ 6π k 3 max eig(γ e + γ m )…”
Section: Maximization Of G/qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the diameter of the wire should be optimized to spread the current out as much as possible over the surface of the antenna, which in turn maximizes the radiation efficiency. In the future, more accurate bounds on the radiation efficiency can be derived for arbitrarily shaped antennas [40][41][42][43]. Furthermore, limitations on the radiation efficiency of magneto-dielectric loaded antennas can also be derived using a similar analysis, and the results should be compared to the limits of metallic antennas.…”
Section: Coupled Tm10:te20 Antenna (Electric Dipole)mentioning
confidence: 99%