The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2013
DOI: 10.1590/s2317-15372013000300011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum period to assess the potential of germination of coffee seeds

Abstract: In recent research, early stages of coffee seedling development were identified, after radicle protrusion, in which all the essential parts of the seedling can be assessed to demonstrate the potential of seed germination to generate normal plants. Thus, the objective of this research was to develop studies to reduce the time on the germination test. Ten seed lots of coffee were assessed through the germination test, every two days, from the tenth day of sowing, according to the morphological criteria of the se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time required to stop the appearance of normal seedlings (stabilization period), estimated by the regression model, was 23 days for S5 and 13 days for S4, showing that the choice of the germination test at a normal seedling stage prior (S4) to the original (S5) the experiment can be finished 10 days before. Guimarães et al (2013) worked with Coffea arabica seedlings and managed to reduce the germination test from 30 to 16 days by adopting a stage before the recommended criterion of normal seedling for the species, demonstrating the possibility to obtain the seed viability faster.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The time required to stop the appearance of normal seedlings (stabilization period), estimated by the regression model, was 23 days for S5 and 13 days for S4, showing that the choice of the germination test at a normal seedling stage prior (S4) to the original (S5) the experiment can be finished 10 days before. Guimarães et al (2013) worked with Coffea arabica seedlings and managed to reduce the germination test from 30 to 16 days by adopting a stage before the recommended criterion of normal seedling for the species, demonstrating the possibility to obtain the seed viability faster.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum number of normal seedlings at stage S4 was observed at ten days after sowing, whereas the maximum number of normal seedlings considering the criterion adopted in the routine analysis of laboratories (stage S5) occurred at 14 and 19 days, indicating the need for intermediate readings (Figure 3). Therefore, the adoption of stage S4 as the final moment to evaluate the number of normal seedlings has operational advantages in the routine of a laboratory, as it requires less frequency of evaluations (Guimarães et al, 2013;Tomaz et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the evaluation of physiological quality, which involves germination and vigor tests, is essential (Guimarães, Rosa, Coelho, Veiga, & Clemente, 2013). The reduction of time to germination test in the laboratories would be favorable for the production, commercialization, utilization and fiscalization of seeds (Guimarães et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the evaluation of physiological quality, which involves germination and vigor tests, is essential (Guimarães, Rosa, Coelho, Veiga, & Clemente, 2013). The reduction of time to germination test in the laboratories would be favorable for the production, commercialization, utilization and fiscalization of seeds (Guimarães et al, 2013). Tests such as the LERCAFE, which provides results in a relatively short period of time, are in the highest demand because they facilitate decision making at the different steps of the production process (Reis, Araújo, Dias, Sediyamam, & Meireles, 2010;Zonta, Araújo, Araújo, Reis, & Zonta, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%