2020
DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2020079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum operating pressure for a gas storage salt cavern under an emergency: a case study of Jintan, China

Abstract: Decreasing the gas pressure is one of the most effective methods to increase the working gas capacity of salt cavern Underground Gas Storages (UGS). In this paper, KING-1 and -2 caverns of Jintan salt cavern UGS, Jiangsu province, China, are studied as an example to investigate their responses under extremely low gas pressure. A 3D geomechanical model of the two caverns is built based on the geological features and rock properties of the host rock salt formation. Different operating conditions are simulated. S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are usually many difficulties in constructing vertical caverns in such formations if conventional single-well leaching methods are used. For example, the height of the salt cavity is limited by the mezzanine, and insoluble impurities accumulated at the bottom of the cavity crowd the cavity's effective gas storage space [22,23]. In addition, there is also the potential for interlayers collapse and causing shearing damage to casing [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are usually many difficulties in constructing vertical caverns in such formations if conventional single-well leaching methods are used. For example, the height of the salt cavity is limited by the mezzanine, and insoluble impurities accumulated at the bottom of the cavity crowd the cavity's effective gas storage space [22,23]. In addition, there is also the potential for interlayers collapse and causing shearing damage to casing [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%