2001
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200104000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Local Analgesic Dose of Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Labor and the Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl

Abstract: Under the conditions of this study, the addition of intrathecal fentanyl 5 microg offers a similar significant bupivacaine dose-sparing effect as 15 and 25 microg. Analgesia in the first stage of labor can be achieved using lower doses of fentanyl, resulting in less pruritus but with a shortening of duration of action.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
55
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
55
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample size estimations are based on a previous up-down sequential allocation study of intrathecal bupivacaine with varying doses of fentanyl in which the median (SD) local anesthetic dose of plain bupivacaine was estimated to be 1.99 (0.486) mg. 4 Using the two-sided Student's t test with an estimated standard deviation of 0.486 mg and assuming equal variance between groups, 15 patients per group were required to estimate a 25% difference C 0.5 mg at alpha = 0.05 (two-sided), with power of 0.8. Estimations of the ED50 and 95% CIs using the formula of Dixon and Massey are based on the sequence of successful or failed doses, whichever series includes fewer observations; 12 therefore, recruitment continued until a minimum number of 15 effective and ineffective outcomes were recorded for each group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sample size estimations are based on a previous up-down sequential allocation study of intrathecal bupivacaine with varying doses of fentanyl in which the median (SD) local anesthetic dose of plain bupivacaine was estimated to be 1.99 (0.486) mg. 4 Using the two-sided Student's t test with an estimated standard deviation of 0.486 mg and assuming equal variance between groups, 15 patients per group were required to estimate a 25% difference C 0.5 mg at alpha = 0.05 (two-sided), with power of 0.8. Estimations of the ED50 and 95% CIs using the formula of Dixon and Massey are based on the sequence of successful or failed doses, whichever series includes fewer observations; 12 therefore, recruitment continued until a minimum number of 15 effective and ineffective outcomes were recorded for each group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing interval was bupivacaine 0.25 mg for all groups. 4 An investigator with no other study responsibilities (M.G.) implemented a simple randomization scheme in Excel by generating the sequence 1-100 and assigning the numbers 1-50 to control and 51-100 to hydromorphone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sezaryen için düşük dozlarda bupivakainin (5-8 mg) opioidlerle birlikte kullanımı ile başarılı anestezi uygulamaları bildirilmiş-tir. [7,8] Ancak biz opioid kullanmadığımız için spinal grupta bupivakini rutinde kullanılan dozlarda (12.5 mg), KSEB grubunda ise spinal gruba göre oldukça düşük (7.5 mg) dozlarda uyguladık. Daha önce yapılan çalışmalarda da bildirildiği üzere KSEB uygulamasında düşük doz lokal anestezik ajan uygulanarak hızla spinal blok sağlanabilir ve daha sonra epidural ek dozlar ile duyusal blok seviyesi istenilen segmentlere genişletilebilir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The subarachnoid and epidural drug doses were standardized with each patient receiving subarachnoid bupivacaine 3.125 mg plus fentanyl 5 lg as the initial spinal dose (i.e., 0.125% bupivacaine 2.5 mL plus fentanyl 2 lgÁmL -1 ), well within the established range for intrathecal dosing. 4,11 The bedside nurse was instructed to give the study drug intravenously as a bolus within 60 sec of administration of the spinal dose. After the epidural catheter was securely placed, all patients were positioned in a left lateral position for at least 30 min after CSE placement, and the continuous FHR and uterine contraction monitors were repositioned.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%