2020
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/993/1/012053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Length Minimum Delay Scheduling Using Artificial Butterfly Optimization (ABO) Algorithm in Manet

Abstract: Recently, the requirement for various real-time applications over Mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs) has been increasing tremandously. Packet scheduling and routing algorithms are the important factors for improving the Quality of service (QoS) parameters over the MANETs. Still, it is not easy to proficiently aid multimedia broadcast with its stringent delay constraints over MANETs. Moreover, there are several problems in assisting QoS over MANETs owing to interference amid nodes in the network. In this paper, Mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This superior performance of the proposed MFPA-FSPS scheme with different pause times is mainly achieved because of the diminished complexity of the Sugeno fuzzy inference engine used for the priority-based packet scheduling process. In addition, Table 3 presents the mean PDR, mean throughput, mean end-to-end delay and mean energy consumption of the proposed MFPA-FSPS scheme with the recently proposed approaches [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] considered for evaluation under an increasing number of packets. The mean PDR of the proposed MFPA-FSPS scheme is improved by 8.21%, 9.96% and 10.54%, which is better than the benchmarked FBRPS, ABOMLMDSS and APA schemes.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Proposed Mfpa-fsps With the Existi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This superior performance of the proposed MFPA-FSPS scheme with different pause times is mainly achieved because of the diminished complexity of the Sugeno fuzzy inference engine used for the priority-based packet scheduling process. In addition, Table 3 presents the mean PDR, mean throughput, mean end-to-end delay and mean energy consumption of the proposed MFPA-FSPS scheme with the recently proposed approaches [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] considered for evaluation under an increasing number of packets. The mean PDR of the proposed MFPA-FSPS scheme is improved by 8.21%, 9.96% and 10.54%, which is better than the benchmarked FBRPS, ABOMLMDSS and APA schemes.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Proposed Mfpa-fsps With the Existi...mentioning
confidence: 99%