2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0255-2701(02)00005-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum fluidization velocities for gas–solid 2D beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most important parameters to characterize fluidized bed 1 Corresponding Author: David Escudero (drescude@iastate.edu) 47 conditions is the mm1mum fluidization velocity (Umr) [1], which is related to the drag force needed to attain solid suspension in the gas phase. The minimum fluidization velocity also constitutes a reference for evaluating fluidization intensity when the bed is operated at higher gas velocities [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most important parameters to characterize fluidized bed 1 Corresponding Author: David Escudero (drescude@iastate.edu) 47 conditions is the mm1mum fluidization velocity (Umr) [1], which is related to the drag force needed to attain solid suspension in the gas phase. The minimum fluidization velocity also constitutes a reference for evaluating fluidization intensity when the bed is operated at higher gas velocities [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramos et al [1] studied the minimum fluidization velocity for gas-solid 2D fluidized beds. They used a rectangular bed (1 x0.2x0.012 m) filled with glass beads of three different diameters (160-250, 250-400, and 490-700 !lm) and various bed heights (2, 4, 8, 16, 20, 40, and 60 em).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramos Caicedo et al [27] fluidized glass ballotoni (density ρ s = 2550 kg/m 3 particle size d p = 250 − 400 μm) and demonstrated that the minimum fluidization velocity in 2D fluidized beds was dependent on the thickness and height of the bed. Thus, significant differences in the U mf (up to 500%) were detected when the bed height was varied from h = 8 cm to h = 60 cm (bed thickness t = 6 mm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, significant differences in the U mf (up to 500%) were detected when the bed height was varied from h = 8 cm to h = 60 cm (bed thickness t = 6 mm). Ramos Caicedo et al [27] proposed a correlation for the extrapolation of the U mf in 2D fluidized beds to the U mf of a 3D bed; however, the constant in the proposed correlation was dependent on the particle size. Thus, the correlation could not be used when different experimental conditions were applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we decided to investigate how the choice of bed depth value affects the numerical prediction of In the literature, the effect of the bed thickness has mainly been studied with respect to the minimum fluidization velocity. It was observed that the latter increases as the bed thickness decreases (Caicedo et al, 2002;Kathuria & Saxena, 1987;Sanchez-Delgado et al, 2011;Saxena & Vadivel, 1988). This is because, as the bed depth reduces, the effect of wall friction becomes more pronounced, limiting the movement of the particles.…”
Section: Dem Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 97%