2013
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2012.2211995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Distance and Trapping Set Analysis of Protograph-Based LDPC Convolutional Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
80
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain d min = 8, we see from Table I that it is necessary to increase the pre-lifting factor to at least m = 2. It is known that the shortest possible (optimal) (2, 3)-regular code has parameters [45,16,8] [38], which is not too far from the pre-lifted [54, 19,8] code constructed in Section IV-A-1 with m = 2 and r = 9 (which was obtained with no particular effort to minimize block length).…”
Section: ) Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain d min = 8, we see from Table I that it is necessary to increase the pre-lifting factor to at least m = 2. It is known that the shortest possible (optimal) (2, 3)-regular code has parameters [45,16,8] [38], which is not too far from the pre-lifted [54, 19,8] code constructed in Section IV-A-1 with m = 2 and r = 9 (which was obtained with no particular effort to minimize block length).…”
Section: ) Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymptotic weight distribution has also been derived for MET LDPC ensembles [25], for IRA ensembles [44], for protograph ensembles [45], for generalizations of LDPC codes [46,47], and for LDPC convolutional codes [48]. Weight distributions have also been evaluated for many finite-length code ensembles; in this case, analysis involves numerical optimization procedures in order to calculate the relevant distributions.…”
Section: Example 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since non-binary LDPC codes not only can outperform their binary counterparts in some cases (e.g., for short/moderate codeword length), but also can be seamlessly combined with high-order modulations [37], [63]- [65], protograph LDPC codes have been extended to the non-binary domain recently [66]- [69]. As a further advancement, the protograph framework has been introduced for convolutional codes [70] so as to form the protograph LDPC convolutional codes [71]- [73], which have certain advantages as compared to protograph LDPC codes without increasing complexity. In addition, some other variants of protograph codes, such as protograph-based raptor-like (PBRL) codes and spatially-coupled protographbased (SCPB) codes, have been developed [74]- [78].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012 He et al [117] First application of protograph codes to JSCC systems. 2013 Mitchell et al [73] Analyzed the minimum distance and trapping set of the protograph-based convolutional codes. 2013 C. A. Kelley [104] Proposed the algebraic protograph codes and their corresponding implementation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%