2015 American Control Conference (ACC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2015.7171972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum cost constrained input-output and control configuration co-design problem: A structural systems approach

Abstract: In this paper, we study the minimal cost constrained input-output (I/O) and control configuration co-design problem. Given a linear time-invariant plant, where a collection of possible inputs and outputs is known a priori, we aim to determine the collection of inputs, outputs and communication among them incurring in the minimum cost, such that desired control performance, measured in terms of arbitrary poleplacement capability of the closed-loop system, is ensured. We show that this problem is NP-hard in gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence one can conclude if generic arbitrary pole placement is possible in a structural system in polynomial time. However, optimal selection of input-output set that guarantee arbitrary pole placement cannot be solved in polynomial time unless P = NP [5].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence one can conclude if generic arbitrary pole placement is possible in a structural system in polynomial time. However, optimal selection of input-output set that guarantee arbitrary pole placement cannot be solved in polynomial time unless P = NP [5].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that for this class of systems Problem 1 is not NP-hard [5]. Pequito.et al addressed Problem 1 along with costs for feedback edges in [5] and obtained a polynomial time optimal algorithm. In the following result we prove that the polynomial time algorithm given in this paper also gives an optimal solution to Problem 1.…”
Section: A Irreducible Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input selection with different inputs and constraints has been considered in [11], [12], [13], [14], [5]. In [11], the authors study the problem of minimizing total control effort for a given state transfer while ensuring controllability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same algorithm is then employed in [28] for SSA selection with simpler H 2 /H ∞ formulations. The SA selection with control configuration selection problem is formulated in [25] using structural design and graph theory, which is proven to be NP-hard. Although this particular problem is similar to the SSASP with SOFC given in (2), the problem proposed in [25], along with the algorithms, are based on the information of structural pattern of the dynamic matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other drawback of this method is that arbitrary convex constraints on the binary selection variables are not easy to include. Finally, the algorithm proposed in [25]-which interestingly runs in polynomial-time if the structure of the dynamic matrix is irreducible-only computes the structure and the corresponding costs of the feedback matrix (along with the sets of selected SA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%