2023
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Few studies have established the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for physical function and pain. OBJECTIVE: To establish MCID for physical function and pain patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for MIS-TLIF through anchor-and distribution-based methods using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as the anchor. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients undergoing primary MIS-TLIF with preoperative and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of score improvement for individual patients was used to determine achievement of minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) through comparison to threshold values as found in previous spine literature. The MCID values used for this current study were as follows: VAS-BP: 1.8, VAS-LP: 2.4, ODI: 14.9, SF-12 MCS: 10.1, SF-12 PCS: 2.5, VR-12 MCS: 11.2, VR-12 PCS: 4.1, PROMIS-PF: 4.2, PHQ-9: 3.0 [ 13 - 17 ]. MCID achievement rates were compared between the 2 cohorts using chi-square tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of score improvement for individual patients was used to determine achievement of minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) through comparison to threshold values as found in previous spine literature. The MCID values used for this current study were as follows: VAS-BP: 1.8, VAS-LP: 2.4, ODI: 14.9, SF-12 MCS: 10.1, SF-12 PCS: 2.5, VR-12 MCS: 11.2, VR-12 PCS: 4.1, PROMIS-PF: 4.2, PHQ-9: 3.0 [ 13 - 17 ]. MCID achievement rates were compared between the 2 cohorts using chi-square tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%