1969
DOI: 10.2307/1267020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Bias Estimation and Experimental Design for Response Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Draper (1959, 1963) presented the average mean squared error (AMSE) criterion integrated over the experimental region as an evaluation criterion, involving variance and bias. Later, Karson et al (1969) introduced an alternative criterion of response surface estimators to AMSE, termed minimum bias estimation (MBE). Next, we will briefly recapitulate these two methodologies.…”
Section: Review Of Average Mean Squared Error (Amse) Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Draper (1959, 1963) presented the average mean squared error (AMSE) criterion integrated over the experimental region as an evaluation criterion, involving variance and bias. Later, Karson et al (1969) introduced an alternative criterion of response surface estimators to AMSE, termed minimum bias estimation (MBE). Next, we will briefly recapitulate these two methodologies.…”
Section: Review Of Average Mean Squared Error (Amse) Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MBE approach is introduced in the next section. Karson et al (1969) proposed an alternative estimation procedure to Box and Draper's approach, the minimization of APV can be achieved for a particular design selected by the experimenter under condition that ASB is first minimized. That is, the ASB is minimized not by design, instead by estimation.…”
Section: Average Mean Squared Error (Amse) Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations