1981
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.27.12.1453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing Variation of Flow Time in Single Machine Systems

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of n jobs to be scheduled on a single machine in such a way that flow time variation is minimized. When the measure of variation is total absolute difference of completion times (TADC) the problem is shown to be quite simple. Sufficient conditions are shown for minimal TADC and a simple method for generating an optimal solution is provided. When the measure of variation is variance of flow time the problem is much more difficult. For this case a heuristic method for scheduling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(5),JPAR (5,50),XCOMP (5,50), CXOPER (5,50),PITEM (5,50),NASM(5),NCOMP (5,50,5),XMACH (5,50,4), CPT (5,50,4),COUNT,ARR,TPT,CPATH(5),PATH (5,50),CPMOD(5),RWK(1000), CRASM(1000),ROPT(1000),NOPT(5),ZZ (14),A(15),BD (5,50),QMC(4) C,XPATH (5,50) COMMON QSET(50000) EQUIVALENCE (NSET(1),QSET (1) (5,50),XCOMP (5,50), CXOPER (5,50),PITEM (5,50),NASM(5),NCOMP (5,50,5),XMACH (5,50,4), CPT (5,50,4),COUNT,ARR,TPT,CPATH(5),PATH (5,50),CPMOD(5),RWK(1000), CRASM(1000),ROPT(1000),NOPT(5),ZZ (14),A(15),BD (5,50) (4).EQ.ATRIB (7))GO TO 15 RWK(JOB)=RWK(JOB)-ATRIB (7) ROPT(~OB)=~OPT(JOB)-1…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(5),JPAR (5,50),XCOMP (5,50), CXOPER (5,50),PITEM (5,50),NASM(5),NCOMP (5,50,5),XMACH (5,50,4), CPT (5,50,4),COUNT,ARR,TPT,CPATH(5),PATH (5,50),CPMOD(5),RWK(1000), CRASM(1000),ROPT(1000),NOPT(5),ZZ (14),A(15),BD (5,50),QMC(4) C,XPATH (5,50) COMMON QSET(50000) EQUIVALENCE (NSET(1),QSET (1) (5,50),XCOMP (5,50), CXOPER (5,50),PITEM (5,50),NASM(5),NCOMP (5,50,5),XMACH (5,50,4), CPT (5,50,4),COUNT,ARR,TPT,CPATH(5),PATH (5,50),CPMOD(5),RWK(1000), CRASM(1000),ROPT(1000),NOPT(5),ZZ (14),A(15),BD (5,50) (4).EQ.ATRIB (7))GO TO 15 RWK(JOB)=RWK(JOB)-ATRIB (7) ROPT(~OB)=~OPT(JOB)-1…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GO TO (20,30,40,50) (7) IF(MACH.EQ.B (10))RETURN MACH=B (10) C**** C**** ITEM=B (4) JTYPE=B ( 1 ) JOB=B ( JTYPE=A ( 1) ITEM=A (4) JOB=A (9) A ( 13 )=TNOW A (11)=A (2) The vita has been removed from the scanned document…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main points to make: first, we do not have to enumerate over all n values of q; second, we can get v and v by solving MAD_mC in O(n log (n)) time via the algorithm due to Kanet [10]. Thus, v=v ¼ 4 as before, and we get an O(n 3 /e 2 ) FPTAS for MAD_MC.…”
Section: For Each Q 2 Nmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Kanet [10] has given an O (n log (n)) time solution in this case. An optimal schedule here is also V-shaped w.r.t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1970s, the problem has been known to be applicable in various contexts, see, e.g., Merten and Muller (1972) where this objective function is first introduced. Cheng and Kubiak (2005) refer to Kanet (1981) to stress that the CTV as a measure of the schedule quality "is applicable to any service and manufacturing setting where it is desirable to provide jobs or customers with approximately the same level of service" .…”
Section: Minimizing Completion Time Variancementioning
confidence: 99%