“…For tasks involving a block structure and alternating response options (such as the IAT) stimulus-response compatibility (De Houwer, 2001), task switching (Klauer & Mierke, 2005), figure-ground asymmetry (Rothermund & Wentura, 2004), recoding (Rothermund, Teige-Mocigemba, Gast, & Wentura, 2009), and block order (Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2007) may influence not only the absolute size but potentially the rank order of obtained effects. Likewise, intentionally rating the primes instead of the targets (Bar-Anan & Nosek, 2012), attention to category membership (Gawronski, Cunningham, LeBel, & Deutsch, 2010), length of stimulus onset asynchrony and backward checking strategies represent sources of construct irrelevant variance on priming tasks (see Wentura & Degner, 2010 for a detailed discussion).…”