2009
DOI: 10.1080/17470210701822975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF)

Abstract: Recoding processes can influence the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) in a way that impedes an unequivocal interpretation of the resulting compatibility effects. We present a modified version of the IAT that aims to eliminate recoding, the IAT-RF (short for "IAT-recoding free"). In the IAT-RF, compatible and incompatible assignments of categories to responses switch randomly between trials within a single experimental block. Abandoning an extended sequence of consistent cate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
140
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 The discovery of method related variance on IAT effects has led to the emergence of a second generation of IAT alternatives that aim to circumvent the block structure of the task and its relativistic nature. Examples include the Single Block IAT (Teige-Mocigemba, Klauer, & Rothermund, 2008), Recoding Free IAT (Rothermund et al, 2009) and the Sorting Paired Features Task (Bar-Anan, Nosek, & Vianello, 2009). Equally, a number of strategies have also been devised to reduce method variance on sematic and evaluative priming tasks (see Wentura & Degner, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 The discovery of method related variance on IAT effects has led to the emergence of a second generation of IAT alternatives that aim to circumvent the block structure of the task and its relativistic nature. Examples include the Single Block IAT (Teige-Mocigemba, Klauer, & Rothermund, 2008), Recoding Free IAT (Rothermund et al, 2009) and the Sorting Paired Features Task (Bar-Anan, Nosek, & Vianello, 2009). Equally, a number of strategies have also been devised to reduce method variance on sematic and evaluative priming tasks (see Wentura & Degner, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tasks involving a block structure and alternating response options (such as the IAT) stimulus-response compatibility (De Houwer, 2001), task switching (Klauer & Mierke, 2005), figure-ground asymmetry (Rothermund & Wentura, 2004), recoding (Rothermund, Teige-Mocigemba, Gast, & Wentura, 2009), and block order (Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2007) may influence not only the absolute size but potentially the rank order of obtained effects. Likewise, intentionally rating the primes instead of the targets (Bar-Anan & Nosek, 2012), attention to category membership (Gawronski, Cunningham, LeBel, & Deutsch, 2010), length of stimulus onset asynchrony and backward checking strategies represent sources of construct irrelevant variance on priming tasks (see Wentura & Degner, 2010 for a detailed discussion).…”
Section: Procedural Properties (Construct Irrelevant)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is difficult to interpret the meaning of IAT effects because it is unclear with regard to which feature the target and attribute categories are compatible. To overcome this problem of the IAT, Rothermund and colleagues recently introduced a modified version of the IAT, which they termed IAT-RF (short for 'Recoding-Free IAT'; Rothermund, Teige-Mocigemba, Gast, & Wentura, 2009). Basically, the IAT-RF aims to eliminate effects of recoding by abandoning the block structure of the IAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pre-training assessment stage, participants completed a recoding-free version of the implicit association task (Houben, Rothermund & Wiers, 2009;Rothermund, Teige-Mocigemba, Gast & Wentura, 2009). This not only shortened the task (from the standard 5 blocks to 3 blocks), but also made the critical phase (Block 3) more similar to the training stage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%