2008
DOI: 10.1021/ja804306c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing the Hydrodynamic Size of Quantum Dots with Multifunctional Multidentate Polymer Ligands

Abstract: Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) are light-emitting nanocrystals with unique optical and electronic properties that are not available from organic dyes or fluorescent proteins. 1 In the near term, one of the most promising applications of these particles is for use as fluorescent probes for molecular, cellular, and in vivo imaging. 2 However, a major problem is the large size of conventional QD probes, which adversely affects their molecular binding and in vivo biodistribution. This bulkiness is not an intrins… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
174
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particle size distribution can be examined in samples suspended (e.g., in 0.05 % ethanol) and dispersed using a mixer, vortex, and/or ultrasonic treatment (e.g., 35 kHz for 10 min) by dynamic light scattering measurements with an ultrafine particle analyzer measuring the light that scatters back from the sample, calculating the Doppler shift to determine particle size (range 0.003-6.5 lm) using as a light source (e.g., 780-nm) a semiconductor laser directed at the sample through a fiber optic cable and a measurement angle of 180° (Ma-Hock et al 2007b). References on method and/or caveats Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) Landsiedel et al (2010a) Dynamic light scattering Ma-Hock et al (2007a, b) Gel electrophoresis Bücking and Nann (2006), Hanauer et al (2007), Park and Hamad-Schifferli (2008) Size exclusion chromatography in organic solvents Al-Somali et al (2004), Krueger et al (2005), Wang et al (2004) Size exclusion chromatography in aqueous phase Pinaud et al (2004), Carion et al (2007), Smith and Nie (2008) Analytical ultracentrifugation Calabretta et al (2005), Jamison et al (2008), Lees et al (2008), Schulze et al (2008), Landsiedel et al (2010a, b) Magnetic sedimentation Berret et al (2007) The particle size distribution and agglomeration state can be determined by analytical ultracentrifugation, an adequate method for the determination of particle size distribution Landsiedel et al 2010b). Up to 300,000 g, solutes and NP sediment into fractions that are separated according to their size in the range 0.5-10,000 nm.…”
Section: Methods For Studying Toxicokinetics Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle size distribution can be examined in samples suspended (e.g., in 0.05 % ethanol) and dispersed using a mixer, vortex, and/or ultrasonic treatment (e.g., 35 kHz for 10 min) by dynamic light scattering measurements with an ultrafine particle analyzer measuring the light that scatters back from the sample, calculating the Doppler shift to determine particle size (range 0.003-6.5 lm) using as a light source (e.g., 780-nm) a semiconductor laser directed at the sample through a fiber optic cable and a measurement angle of 180° (Ma-Hock et al 2007b). References on method and/or caveats Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) Landsiedel et al (2010a) Dynamic light scattering Ma-Hock et al (2007a, b) Gel electrophoresis Bücking and Nann (2006), Hanauer et al (2007), Park and Hamad-Schifferli (2008) Size exclusion chromatography in organic solvents Al-Somali et al (2004), Krueger et al (2005), Wang et al (2004) Size exclusion chromatography in aqueous phase Pinaud et al (2004), Carion et al (2007), Smith and Nie (2008) Analytical ultracentrifugation Calabretta et al (2005), Jamison et al (2008), Lees et al (2008), Schulze et al (2008), Landsiedel et al (2010a, b) Magnetic sedimentation Berret et al (2007) The particle size distribution and agglomeration state can be determined by analytical ultracentrifugation, an adequate method for the determination of particle size distribution Landsiedel et al 2010b). Up to 300,000 g, solutes and NP sediment into fractions that are separated according to their size in the range 0.5-10,000 nm.…”
Section: Methods For Studying Toxicokinetics Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, an effective passivation is a critical step to avoid any detrimental effect on the host biosystem and to stabilize the chemical and structural integrity of the QD [38,39]. A spherical structure of (CdSe) 13 and a large surface-to-volume ratio facilitate a high density coating with various organic ligands [24][25][26][27]. Among many available ligands coupled to CdSe QDs [40][41][42][43][44][45], trimethyl phosphine oxide (TMPO) and its derivatives (i.e., OPMe 2 (CH 2 ) n Me, n = 0, 1-3) stand out due to their high ligand exchange capacity on the CdSe surface [46].…”
Section: (Cdse) 13 Coating With Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, commercially available QDs are large (~15À20 nm diameter), which can hinder the dynamics of many motor proteins, especially when two QDs are used. Several groups have developed smaller QDs for in vivo labeling [33,34], but reduction in the thickness of the polymer coat around the semiconductor core of a QD reduces their solubility and photostability over extended periods of time. In addition, QDs "blink" on and off frequently.…”
Section: Choosing the Right Fluorophore For The Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%