2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00453-016-0153-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing the Aggregate Movements for Interval Coverage

Abstract: We consider an interval coverage problem. Given n intervals of the same length on a line L and a line segment B on L, we want to move the intervals along L such that every point of B is covered by at least one interval and the sum of the moving distances of all intervals is minimized. As a basic geometry problem, it has applications in mobile sensor barrier coverage in wireless sensor networks. The previous work solved the problem in O(n 2 ) time. In this paper, by discovering many interesting observations and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-uniform case of the problem is NP-hard [8]. For the uniform case, Czyzowicz et al [8] gave an O(n 2 ) time algorithm, and recently, Andrews and Wang [1] proposed an O(n log n) time solution. Another variation of the problem is the min-num version, where the goal is to move the minimum number of sensors to form a barrier coverage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The non-uniform case of the problem is NP-hard [8]. For the uniform case, Czyzowicz et al [8] gave an O(n 2 ) time algorithm, and recently, Andrews and Wang [1] proposed an O(n log n) time solution. Another variation of the problem is the min-num version, where the goal is to move the minimum number of sensors to form a barrier coverage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We "parameterize" our decision algorithm with λ as a parameter. Although we do not know the value λ * , we execute the decision algorithm in such a way that it will determine the same solution subset of sensors s g (1) , s g (2) , . .…”
Section: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the same setting, the case of heterogeneous sensors was shown to be also solvable in polynomial time in [7], and the algorithm of [8] for the homogeneous case was also improved. An O(n 2 ) algorithm for the MinSum problem with homogeneous sensors is given in [9], and an improved O(n log n) algorithm is presented in [1]. It was proved in [9] that the MinSum problem is NP-hard when sensors have heterogeneous ranges.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If sensors have different ranges, then the problem is NP-hard [8]. Otherwise, Czyzowicz et al [8] gave an O(n 2 ) time algorithm, and Andrews and Wang [1] improved the algorithm to O(n log n) time. The min-num version of the problem was also studied, where the goal is to move the minimum number of sensors to form a barrier coverage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%