2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1527-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing Interpolation Bias and Precision Error in In Vivo µCT-Based Measurements of Bone Structure and Dynamics

Abstract: In vivo μCT imaging allows for high-resolution, longitudinal evaluation of bone properties. Based on this technology, several recent studies have developed in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry techniques that utilize registered μCT images to identify regions of bone formation and resorption, allowing for longitudinal assessment of bone remodeling. However, this analysis requires a direct voxel-by-voxel subtraction between image pairs, necessitating rotation of the images into the same coordinate system, which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 3D, in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry technique was developed to track bone resorption and formation activities. (30,32) A trabecular bone subvolume (1.575 Â 1.575 Â 1.05 mm 3 ) of each week in phase 2 (weeks 12 to 16) was subtracted from the registered subvolume of the previous week (weeks 11 to 15) by comparing two subsequent, registered scans. The bone voxels that exist in the second scan but do not exist in the first scan were defined as new bone formation (green; Fig.…”
Section: D In Vivo Dynamic Bone Histomorphometry Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A 3D, in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry technique was developed to track bone resorption and formation activities. (30,32) A trabecular bone subvolume (1.575 Â 1.575 Â 1.05 mm 3 ) of each week in phase 2 (weeks 12 to 16) was subtracted from the registered subvolume of the previous week (weeks 11 to 15) by comparing two subsequent, registered scans. The bone voxels that exist in the second scan but do not exist in the first scan were defined as new bone formation (green; Fig.…”
Section: D In Vivo Dynamic Bone Histomorphometry Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies suggested a positive effect of combined or tandem bisphosphonate and PTH therapies, attesting to PTH's anabolic effect in the absence of resorption . In our previous studies, we developed a set of in vivo imaging techniques that can assess bone formation and resorption activities simultaneously and longitudinally . By applying these techniques to 3‐month‐old, intact female rats we demonstrated an additive effect by combined PTH and alendronate (ALN, a bisphosphonate) treatments on bone microarchitecture and stiffness over either monotherapy .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In vivo μCT images of the proximal tibia made at weeks 0 and 4 post-OVX were used to assess the effects of reproductive history on the post-OVX deterioration of individual trabecular elements. For each rat, sequential μCT images were registered to precisely align the trabecular features, as described in (20,25,26) , and a 1.5×1.5×1 mm trabecular subvolume located 1 mm distal to the growth plate was extracted from μCT images at 0 and 4 weeks post-OVX. The post-OVX changes of each individual trabecula, such as percent bone loss due to trabecular thinning, rod disconnection, or plate perforation, were quantified through an individual trabecular dynamics (ITD) analysis, as described in (27) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement is based on the 3D rigid image registration of the time-lapsed in vivo μ CT scans. The bone formation and resorption are detected according to the appearance and disappearance of the voxels at consecutive scans [5, 13, 14]. The use of in vivo μ CT measurements enables longitudinal studies where each mouse is the control of itself; this can reduce the number of animals required to achieve properly powered conclusion of 60%, if compared to cross-sectional studies [15, 16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%