2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2012.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in maritime transportation the skin-friction contributes to 60 − 70% of the total drag on a cargo ship and 80% on a tanker (Fukuda et al 2000). Considering that shipping alone accounts for 8.5% of the global oil supply (Reuters press release, June 24, 2008, Shipping wasting 4.37 million barrels of oil a day) and 3.3% of CO2 emissions (Qi & Song 2012), even a mild DR has a global impact for energy saving and greenhouse effect reduction. With the DR on SHPo surfaces in TBL flows confirmed, one can next perform systematic studies with various SHPo surfaces in a wide range of hydrodynamic flows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in maritime transportation the skin-friction contributes to 60 − 70% of the total drag on a cargo ship and 80% on a tanker (Fukuda et al 2000). Considering that shipping alone accounts for 8.5% of the global oil supply (Reuters press release, June 24, 2008, Shipping wasting 4.37 million barrels of oil a day) and 3.3% of CO2 emissions (Qi & Song 2012), even a mild DR has a global impact for energy saving and greenhouse effect reduction. With the DR on SHPo surfaces in TBL flows confirmed, one can next perform systematic studies with various SHPo surfaces in a wide range of hydrodynamic flows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides more general discussions on such topics (Hummels 2001;Slack 1985;Djankov et al, 2005;Nordas et al, 2006;Tongzon and Savant 2007), some authors have proposed specific studies of container flows in liner shipping looking at congestion issues in ports (Notteboom, 2006;Verminen et al, 2007;Yan et al, 2009;Jones et al, 2011;Payman, 2011, 2012) but also advanced methodological frameworks including all aspects of port and vessel operations of which total voyage time, voyage time at sea, voyage time in port, average port time, and vessel speed (Moon and Woo, 2013). The latter work is rooted in earlier studies of transit time performance of ocean carriers (Saldanha et al, 2006), notably those looking at time uncertainty in shipping and port operations (Wang and Meng, 2012;Qi and Song, 2012) and measurements of the time factor in liner shipping network design through mathematical modelling (Alvarez, 2012). Suarez-Aleman et al (2013) rightly argued that very few empirical studies have been made about time efficiency, although such aspect is known to be crucial and despite the possibility for inefficient ports to remain attractive for other reasons (Wilmsmeier et al, 2003).…”
Section: The Time Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 it takes a 3000-TEU ship four weeks to finish a round-trip on ship route 2, which consists of time at ports and time at sea (Bell and Bichou, 2008). Then, a string of four 3000-TEU ships must be deployed to maintain a weekly service frequency (Qi and Song, 2012). We let M rv be the number of ships required to maintain a weekly service if ships of type v ∈ V are deployed on ship route r ∈ R. We have M rv = 4 in the above example.…”
Section: Ships and Ship Repositioningmentioning
confidence: 99%