Proceedings of the 2021 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA) 2021
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611976465.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing Convex Functions with Integral Minimizers

Abstract: Given a separation oracle SO for a convex function f that has an integral minimizer inside a box with radius R, we show how to efficiently find a minimizer of f using at most O(n(n + log(R))) calls to SO. When the set of minimizers of f has integral extreme points, our algorithm outputs an integral minimizer of f . This improves upon the previously best oracle complexity of O(n 2 (n + log(R))) obtained by an elegant application of simultaneous diophantine approximation due to Schrijver, Prog. Comb. Opt. 1984… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figuring out what the query complexity of SFM and matroid intersection, regardless of adaptivity, is an intriguing question. Currently, the best known upper bounds on the query complexity for SFM is Õ(N 2 ) [Jia21]. For matroid intersection, the best known upper bounds using rank-oracles is Õ(N 1.5 ) [CLS + 19] and with independence oracles it is Õ(N 9/5 ) [BvdBMN21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figuring out what the query complexity of SFM and matroid intersection, regardless of adaptivity, is an intriguing question. Currently, the best known upper bounds on the query complexity for SFM is Õ(N 2 ) [Jia21]. For matroid intersection, the best known upper bounds using rank-oracles is Õ(N 1.5 ) [CLS + 19] and with independence oracles it is Õ(N 9/5 ) [BvdBMN21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, a lot of work [Cun85, IFF01, Sch00, Orl09, IO09, CJK14, LJJ15, LSW15, CLSW17, DVZ18, ALS20, Jia21] has been done trying to understand the query complexity of SFM. The current best known algorithms are an O(N 3 )-query polynomial-time and an O(N 2 log N )-query exponential time algorithm by Jiang [Jia21] building on the works [LSW15,DVZ18], an Õ(N 2 log M )-query and time algorithm by Lee, Sidford, and Wong [LSW15] where |f (S)| ≤ M for all S ⊆ U , and an Õ(N M 2 ) query and time algorithm by Axelrod, Liu, and Sidford [ALS20] improving upon [CLSW17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F , as noted earlier, corresponds to the differential entropy of a Gaussian vector with covariance M , which is a submodular function, plus an additional modular term. The problem of submodular function minimization has a long and rich history, beginning with the seminal works of Grötschel et al [1981Grötschel et al [ , 2012 and continuing to the current day [Iwata et al, 2001, Schrijver, 2000, Lee et al, 2015, Dadush et al, 2018, Jiang, 2021. Thus, we can invoke any of these known polynomial-time algorithms for submodular function minimization to recover the chain components in topological order.…”
Section: Technical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then a long line of work has developed faster and simpler (combinatorial) algorithms for SFM [Sch00, IFF01, Orl09, LSW15, DVZ21, Jia21]. The work of [Jia21] shows that SFM can be solved by a deterministic algorithm making O(n 2 log n) queries to an evaluation oracle. By the isolating cut lemma of [LP20] this immediately also gives an O(n 2 ) query randomized algorithm for sym-SFM [CQ21,MN21].…”
Section: Introduction and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%