2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.210401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing Backaction through Entangled Measurements

Abstract: When an observable is measured on an evolving coherent quantum system twice, the first measurement generally alters the statistics of the second one, which is known as measurement back-action. We introduce, and push to its theoretical and experimental limits, a novel method of back-action evasion, whereby entangled collective measurements are performed on several copies of the system. This method is inspired by a similar idea designed for the problem of measuring quantum work [Perarnau-Llobet et al., Phys. Rev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental results also show that such technologies can be used to reduce the backaction of projective measurements in quantum thermodynamics. [ 114,115 ]…”
Section: Experimental Progress On the Resource Theory Of Quantum Coherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results also show that such technologies can be used to reduce the backaction of projective measurements in quantum thermodynamics. [ 114,115 ]…”
Section: Experimental Progress On the Resource Theory Of Quantum Coherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[112], the authors apply collective measurements to optimal orienteering protocols based on parallel spins and antiparallel spins. Experimental results also show that such technologies can be used to reduce the backaction of projective measurements in quantum thermodynamics [113,114].…”
Section: A Experimental Detection and Quantification Of Coherencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…See detailed calculation in App. C. Obviously, if the initial state ρ 0 is an eigenstate of A, i.e., ρ 0 = |a i a i |, then ρ 1 = ρ 0 , which implies that system S will not be disturbed after the first measurement [12]. In general, however, system S is disturbed through the first measurement and thus ρ 1 = ρ 0 .…”
Section: A Joint Measurement Model (Prediction)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QBA of prediction is defined by the disturbance caused by prior measurements affecting subsequent measurements, whereas the QBA of retrodiction is expressed through the disturbance caused by the subsequent measurements affecting the prior measurements. The former has been widely being discussed and explored recently, which include sequential weak measurements [5][6][7][8][9], reducing the QBA effect [10][11][12][13], and manipulating qubits [14]. The concepts * Electronic address: binho@riec.tohoku.ac.jp of violating noncontextual realism [15] and the maximal extracting knowledge [16] through sequential measurements are also worth mentioning in this context.…”
Section: Introduction and Preliminary Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%