2000
DOI: 10.2514/2.4566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization of Vibration of Spacecraft Appendages During Shape Control Using Smart Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such large-scale solar array with lightweight deployable members generally has high flexibility and low stiffness, which can result in the low natural frequency of the structure. Once disturbed, it takes a long time for the solar array to sufficiently attenuate the vibration in free response (Fujii and Suda, 2002; Kalaycioglu and Silva, 2000; Na et al , 2014). The long-time vibration with large amplitude and low frequency makes it challenging to maintain the attitude precision and stability of the satellite (Mao et al , 2019; Zhang et al , 2020; Tang et al , 2020; Angeletti et al , 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such large-scale solar array with lightweight deployable members generally has high flexibility and low stiffness, which can result in the low natural frequency of the structure. Once disturbed, it takes a long time for the solar array to sufficiently attenuate the vibration in free response (Fujii and Suda, 2002; Kalaycioglu and Silva, 2000; Na et al , 2014). The long-time vibration with large amplitude and low frequency makes it challenging to maintain the attitude precision and stability of the satellite (Mao et al , 2019; Zhang et al , 2020; Tang et al , 2020; Angeletti et al , 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic shape control of piezo-actuated structures has also received extensive attentions (Irschik, 2002). The improved dynamic shape control of the flexible structures in open loop can be achieved using flatness-based design methodology (Kugi et al, 2006; Schröck et al, 2013) or Pontryagin’s principle (Kalaycioglu and Silva, 2000). However, compared with many flexible structures, the important coupling effect between structure and aerodynamics loads must be considered in modeling, analysis, and control of morphing wings (Bae et al, 2005; Li et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of static shape control estimates the final voltage values for the actuators to reach a required target wing shape. However, the voltage profiles, that is, variation of voltage with respect to time, for each actuator may not be obtained because the static shape control process provides only the initial and final static voltage values (Kalaycioglu and Silva, 2000). Some simple voltage profiles including step and ramp profiles may be applied in practice, and those profiles could excite the low structural modes because of the flexibility necessary to achieve the morphing control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, owing to increased requirement for weight savings, aerospace structures are becoming more flexible, whereas their performance requirements are becoming more stringent. Active vibration control using smart piezoelectric materials has drawn widespread interest in enhancing performance and control characteristics of the flexible structures (Kalaycioglu and Silva, 2000). Piezocomposite materials are advanced piezoelectric devices with effective material properties, good conformability, and anisotropic actuation effects (Bent et al, 1995; Ray and Reddy, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%