2014
DOI: 10.5370/jeet.2014.9.2.478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization of Torque-Ripple in Switched Reluctance Motors Over Wide Speed Range

Abstract: -Torque pulsation mechanism and highly nonlinear magnetic characterization of switched reluctance motors(SRM) lead to unfavorable torque ripple and limit the variety of applications in industry. In this paper, a modification method proposed for torque ripple minimization of SRM based on conventional torque sharing functions(TSF) to improve maximum speed of torque ripple-free operation considering converter limitations. Due to increasing phase inductance in outgoing phase during the commutation region, referenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the testing session, potential participants attended a screening visit during which the SCID, as well as an interview about past and current medical conditions, were conducted to ascertain that none of the exclusion criteria were met. Subsequently, a testing session was scheduled with eligible subjects and, three days before this session, participants were sent completed the following online questionnaires to complete at home: trait subscale of the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene, Vagg, & Jacobs, 1983), Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS, Eckblad, Chapman, Chapman, & Mishlove, 1982), Uncertainty Intolerance Scale (UIS, Buhr & Dugas, 2002), and a demographics form, as well as the BDI (to ensure scores had stayed relatively stable; these are the reported BDI scores).. In addition, subjects answered several questions about their everyday social interactions Specifically, participants were asked 'How many friends do you have?'…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the testing session, potential participants attended a screening visit during which the SCID, as well as an interview about past and current medical conditions, were conducted to ascertain that none of the exclusion criteria were met. Subsequently, a testing session was scheduled with eligible subjects and, three days before this session, participants were sent completed the following online questionnaires to complete at home: trait subscale of the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene, Vagg, & Jacobs, 1983), Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS, Eckblad, Chapman, Chapman, & Mishlove, 1982), Uncertainty Intolerance Scale (UIS, Buhr & Dugas, 2002), and a demographics form, as well as the BDI (to ensure scores had stayed relatively stable; these are the reported BDI scores).. In addition, subjects answered several questions about their everyday social interactions Specifically, participants were asked 'How many friends do you have?'…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Trait scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y (STAI-T) 81 measures anxiety as an enduring personality trait and consists of 20 statements that pertain to how participants “generally feel.” Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated as a sum of all the ratings (ranging from 0 to 80), with a higher score indicating higher trait anxiety.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the testing session, potential participants attended a screening visit during which the SCID, as well as an interview about past and current medical conditions, were conducted to ascertain that none of the exclusion criteria were met. Subsequently, eligible subjects completed the following online questionnaires at home: trait subscale of the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene, Vagg, & Jacobs, 1983), Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS, Eckblad, Chapman, Chapman, & Mishlove, 1982), Uncertainty Intolerance Scale (UIS, Buhr & Dugas, 2002), and a demographics form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%