2006
DOI: 10.1007/11605157_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization of Non-deterministic Automata with Large Alphabets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FSA describes the algorithms that we use to perform intersection and determinization. In [2] the authors give an efficient implementation of minimization for NFAs with large alphabets. The representation of NFA is explicit for states, and symbolic (BDD-based) for labels.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FSA describes the algorithms that we use to perform intersection and determinization. In [2] the authors give an efficient implementation of minimization for NFAs with large alphabets. The representation of NFA is explicit for states, and symbolic (BDD-based) for labels.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AUTLIB is used at the core of an extension of the NUSMV [7] model checker able to deal with the PSL language, and, as explained in [8], it is used to generate the automata necessary for PSL verification. The number of concatenated SEREs is randomly chosen in the range [2,10]. We generated 12 different families of benchmarks, choosing a possible configuration of parameters.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the Paige-Tarjan algorithm [13] (more precisely, from its generalization allowing multiple labels as in [2]), we know that we can compute…”
Section: Complexity Of Computing Downward Bisimulation Via Lts Translmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rather successful intermediate model is the class of unambiguous finite automata (UFAs). 1 While in general still being exponentially more succinct than an equivalent DFA for the same language, static analysis questions such as inclusion and equivalence can be solved in PTIME for UFAs [17]. However, UFAs do not allow for tractable state minimization [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Hromkovic et al [8] about measuring non-determinism in finite automata will be relevant to us in Section 2. Since the minimization problem for NFAs is hard, the bisimulation minimization problem has also been considered; see, e.g., [14,1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%