2016 Progress in Electromagnetic Research Symposium (PIERS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/piers.2016.7734264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization of Gibb's oscillations in transients' simulations using damping resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, an alternative structure for the π circuit cascade is proposed, which involves the absence of damping resistance in half of all π circuits, all of which circuits are grouped in the center of the cascade. In other cases, the different structures of π circuits, with and without damping resistance, are applied alternately in the composition of the cascade used to represent transmission lines or waveguides for analysis and simulations of transient electromagnetic phenomena propagation [29][30][31][32]. If the damping resistances are not applied in each π circuit of the cascade that represents the waveguides or the transmission lines, the numerical simulation can be numerically unstable [28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, an alternative structure for the π circuit cascade is proposed, which involves the absence of damping resistance in half of all π circuits, all of which circuits are grouped in the center of the cascade. In other cases, the different structures of π circuits, with and without damping resistance, are applied alternately in the composition of the cascade used to represent transmission lines or waveguides for analysis and simulations of transient electromagnetic phenomena propagation [29][30][31][32]. If the damping resistances are not applied in each π circuit of the cascade that represents the waveguides or the transmission lines, the numerical simulation can be numerically unstable [28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%